2007
DOI: 10.1128/jcm.01595-06
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Multiple-Locus Variable-Number Tandem Repeat Analysis, Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis, and Phage Typing for Subtype Analysis of Salmonella enterica Serotype Enteritidis

Abstract: Strain subtyping is an important tool for detection of outbreaks caused by Salmonella enterica serotype Enteritidis. Current subtyping methods, however, yield less than optimal subtype discrimination. In this study, we describe the development and evaluation of a multiple-locus variable-number tandem repeat analysis (MLVA) method for subtyping Salmonella serotype Enteritidis. The discrimination ability and epidemiological concordance of MLVA were compared with those of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
145
0
5

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 158 publications
(156 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
6
145
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Given the limited discriminatory power of pulse-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) to differentiate strains of Salmonella serovar Enteritidis, a more discriminatory molecular subtyping method (MLVA) was utilized [18]. Retrospective data analysis identified a marked increase beginning in 2008, in both human NTS serogroup O:9 infections and the recovery of NTS serogroup O:9 from raw chicken and ready to eat food products in Mauritius.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the limited discriminatory power of pulse-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) to differentiate strains of Salmonella serovar Enteritidis, a more discriminatory molecular subtyping method (MLVA) was utilized [18]. Retrospective data analysis identified a marked increase beginning in 2008, in both human NTS serogroup O:9 infections and the recovery of NTS serogroup O:9 from raw chicken and ready to eat food products in Mauritius.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Isolates generated restriction fragments with molecular size ranging from 40 to 700 kb fragments, representing 11 distinct macro restriction profiles. Dendrogram showing similarities of Xba1 digested macro restriction profiles of NTS isolates generated by bio-rod finger printing with the band matching coefficient of Dice and the UPGMA clustering many laboratories [32][33][34]. Genotyping of Salmonella is a rapidly expanding field and many new methods have been developed in recent years.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been widely used as a subtyping tool for the investigation of disease outbreaks (Hyytiä-Trees et al, 2007) and it was also adopted as a standard subtyping tool for an international foodborne disease surveillance network . However, in some cases, PFGE is insufficient in distinguishing between epidemiologically unlinked isolates of genetically monomorphic pathogens, such as Shigella sonnei (Liang et al, 2007), Escherichia coli O157 : H7 (Noller et al, 2003), Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis (Boxrud et al, 2007) and Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium (Chiou et al, 2010;Torpdahl et al, 2007). On the other hand, PFGE is too discriminatory to be an appropriate typing tool for the investigation of the global spread of bacterial clones (Spratt, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%