2011
DOI: 10.1021/ac201706g
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Multiple Prompt γ-Ray Analysis and Prompt γ-Ray Analysis for the Elemental Analysis of Geological and Cosmochemical Samples

Abstract: Multiple prompt γ-ray analysis (MPGA) and conventional neutron-induced prompt γ-ray analysis (PGA) are nondestructive analytical methods for bulk chemical compositions, and their analytical capabilities were compared for elemental analyses of geological and cosmochemical samples. Detection sensitivities of PGA are often restricted by poor signal-to-noise ratios and interferences from different origins. MPGA can substantially reduce the background level, especially for hydrogenous samples, relative to PGA, whic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The only other chondrite falls to which we can compare chlorine data from Clay et al 1) their analysis method is unsuitable for the water-bearing CI-chondrites because samples with large intrinsic water content enable halogen leaching in the reactor during irradiation, (2) the small samples analyzed are not representative for the whole rock, (3) the naturally fine-grained powdery CI-chondrites facilitate recoil-loss, and (4) losses of volatile halogen-bearing salts and organics during sample heating cannot be excluded (see section 2). Chlorine concentrations agree well in larger (> 50 mg) aliquots of larger homogenized samples in the CIchondrite Orgueil (Table 6) analyzed with nuclear radiation techniques (e.g., Dreibus et al 1979, Islam et al 2011, Palme 2019). The values by Dreibus et al (1979) with chemical separation agree within uncertainties to data from ion-chromatography (Menard et al 2013, Magenheim et al 1994, and Tarter 1980.…”
Section: Chlorinementioning
confidence: 64%
“…The only other chondrite falls to which we can compare chlorine data from Clay et al 1) their analysis method is unsuitable for the water-bearing CI-chondrites because samples with large intrinsic water content enable halogen leaching in the reactor during irradiation, (2) the small samples analyzed are not representative for the whole rock, (3) the naturally fine-grained powdery CI-chondrites facilitate recoil-loss, and (4) losses of volatile halogen-bearing salts and organics during sample heating cannot be excluded (see section 2). Chlorine concentrations agree well in larger (> 50 mg) aliquots of larger homogenized samples in the CIchondrite Orgueil (Table 6) analyzed with nuclear radiation techniques (e.g., Dreibus et al 1979, Islam et al 2011, Palme 2019). The values by Dreibus et al (1979) with chemical separation agree within uncertainties to data from ion-chromatography (Menard et al 2013, Magenheim et al 1994, and Tarter 1980.…”
Section: Chlorinementioning
confidence: 64%
“…PGA is a powerful analytical method that has high measurement accuracy, enables us to non-destructive analysis of bulk samples, and can be applied to light elements which are difficult to measure by most other analytical methods 3 5 . Owing to the aforementioned advantages, PGA can be applied in many fields such as measurements of cadmium in rice 6 , measurement of boron in volcanic rock 7 , elemental analysis of meteorites 8 , 9 , and measurement of hydrogen in metal samples by focusing on hydrogen embrittlement in the industrial field 10 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although some specific elements can be quantified by these methods with higher sensitivities than those by INAA, overall analytical capability is quite similar. Later, S/N ratios were highly improved with great innovation using multiple prompt γ-ray analysis (MPGA), which uses a γ–γ coincidence method. Even with these methods, however, 107 Pd cannot be quantitatively determined.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%