AIAA SCITECH 2022 Forum 2022
DOI: 10.2514/6.2022-0411
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Multirotor Wind Estimation Techniques Through Conventional On-board Sensors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These restrictions complicate solar energy resources management and integration of solar energy into the grid. Conventional wind sensors, such as cup anemometers or wind vanes, may have limitations in capturing subtle changes in wind speed and direction, particularly in complex wind flow conditions or at high altitudes [45,46]. As a result, inaccurate wind energy predictions lead to suboptimal utilization of wind power resources.…”
Section: ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These restrictions complicate solar energy resources management and integration of solar energy into the grid. Conventional wind sensors, such as cup anemometers or wind vanes, may have limitations in capturing subtle changes in wind speed and direction, particularly in complex wind flow conditions or at high altitudes [45,46]. As a result, inaccurate wind energy predictions lead to suboptimal utilization of wind power resources.…”
Section: ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To mitigate the Extended Kalman Filter 2 (EKF2) estimation error due to fixed‐wing UAV maneuvers and obtain preflight wind estimates, the use of other atmospheric monitoring devices was determined to be advantageous; a multirotor UAV and weather balloon‐mounted radiosonde were selected for this comparison. An in‐depth analysis of multirotor UAV‐based local wind speed estimates by McConville et al (2022) of the UoB Flight Lab indicates that although further development is necessary, multirotor UAVs could be utilized to produce local 3D atmospheric wind models greatly increasing the accuracy of the MSOAM. Initial comparisons of the multirotor, radiosonde, and fixed‐wing UAV EKF2 wind speed estimates recorded during the January 2022 campaign have determined it is reasonable to assume either method would be suitable for initial preflight wind estimates within the MSOAM at this stage.…”
Section: Flight Data Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The modeling approach used to estimate wind speed is described in detail in the study by McConville et al (2022), where the vehicle is flown through a series of simple maneuvers to develop the wind estimation model under hover conditions. This model is then developed upon in this work to account for the motion of the vehicle while climbing and variation in atmospheric density.…”
Section: Wind Estimation Using Multirotor Vehiclesmentioning
confidence: 99%