2021
DOI: 10.1111/jth.15318
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of multivariate linear regression and a machine learning algorithm developed for prediction of precision warfarin dosing in a Korean population

Abstract: Background Personalized warfarin dosing is influenced by various factors including genetic and non‐genetic factors. Multiple linear regression (LR) is known as a conventional method to develop predictive models. Recently, machine learning approaches have been extensively implemented for warfarin dosing due to the hypothesis of non‐linear association between covariates and stable warfarin dose. Objective To extend the multiple linear regression algorithm for personalized warfarin dosing in a Korean population a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A number of machine learning studies have leveraged International the Warfarin Pharmacogenetics Consortium dataset of 5700 patients from 21 countries, however many of these have incorporated genetic markers associated with warfarin metabolism 46 – 50 , which may offer valuable performance improvements, but cannot be easily integrated into routine clinical practice (while single nucleotide polymorphisms CYP2C9 and VKORC1 were available for a subset of our patients, we elected not to use them in order to enhance the generalizability of our model for real world clinical settings, especially low and middle income countries where warfarin is still routinely used). Ours is also the first study we are aware of to evaluate the use of machine learning for the long-term dynamic management of warfarin in the community, versus warfarin initiation or short-term management during a hospital stay 42 47 . Our study is the largest its kind by a considerable margin, which is relevant given the data-hungry nature of machine learning methods.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of machine learning studies have leveraged International the Warfarin Pharmacogenetics Consortium dataset of 5700 patients from 21 countries, however many of these have incorporated genetic markers associated with warfarin metabolism 46 – 50 , which may offer valuable performance improvements, but cannot be easily integrated into routine clinical practice (while single nucleotide polymorphisms CYP2C9 and VKORC1 were available for a subset of our patients, we elected not to use them in order to enhance the generalizability of our model for real world clinical settings, especially low and middle income countries where warfarin is still routinely used). Ours is also the first study we are aware of to evaluate the use of machine learning for the long-term dynamic management of warfarin in the community, versus warfarin initiation or short-term management during a hospital stay 42 47 . Our study is the largest its kind by a considerable margin, which is relevant given the data-hungry nature of machine learning methods.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The average audio features of the frames were used as input features of the fatigue level classifiers. By using P300 as ground truth, we trained several commonly used classifiers, including linear regression (LR) ( Nguyen et al, 2021 ), linear discriminant analysis (LDA) ( Dornaika and Khoder, 2020 ), K-nearest neighbor (KNN) ( Abu Alfeilat et al, 2019 ), classification and regression trees (CART) ( Johns et al, 2021 ), naive Bayes classifier (NB) ( Sugahara and Ueno, 2021 ), support vector machine (SVM) ( Huang et al, 2018 ), and multilayer perceptron (MLP) ( Panghal and Kumar, 2021 ), to classify the fatigue level of each audio input. Leave-one-out (LOO) cross-validation ( Luo et al, 2015 ) was used to guarantee the generalization performance of our models.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the accuracy of the linear regression model is also affected to a certain extent (Overfitting, as mentioned above), the performance of linear regression is still slightly higher than the other three algorithms when the sample is small. Related research also shows that the linear regression algorithm and its improved algorithm show prediction accuracy comparable to random forest, support vector machine, and the random generalized linear model (Cardoso-Silva et al, 2019;Rath et al, 2020;Meulenbroek and Pichardo, 2021;Nguyen et al, 2021).…”
Section: Prediction Effects Of the Four Algorithm Modelsmentioning
confidence: 97%