2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.mce.2009.12.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of murine and human estrogen sulfotransferase inhibition in vitro and in silico—Implications for differences in activity, subunit dimerization and substrate inhibition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previously, it has been demonstrated that PAPS and PAP have equivalent stabilizing effects on these SULT isoforms [17,43]. Thus, we used PAP (substituting PAPS) in order to generate protein conformations capable to accommodate substrates and inhibitors.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Previously, it has been demonstrated that PAPS and PAP have equivalent stabilizing effects on these SULT isoforms [17,43]. Thus, we used PAP (substituting PAPS) in order to generate protein conformations capable to accommodate substrates and inhibitors.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We achieved very good predictive results using docking-scoring into the best MD conformations for SULT1A1 and SULT1E1. Recently, Stjernschantz and co-workers [43] screened experimentally 34 potential endocrine-disrupting compounds on the murine and human SULT1E1 to identify selective inhibitors of the human enzyme. They then docked the identified active compounds using the software GOLD [53] and performed subsequent MD simulations of the docked complexes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Comparison of murine and human oestrogen sulphotransferase inhibition in vitro and in silico, it suggested that catalytically inactive binding modes, other than the one observed in the crystal structures, be possible in SULT1E1 (Stjernschantz et al, 2010). 7008.…”
Section: (I) Individual Significance Analysis Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Based on docking computations and MD simulations, Stjernschantz et al. explored SULT1E1 to find selective inhibitors and to explain their selectivity. Substrate selectivity profiles of SULT1 A3 and SULT1E1 were investigated by virtual screening experiments and it was shown that the structure‐based approach is useful for prediction of preferential substrate classes.…”
Section: D‐admet: Overall Concepts and Applications In Mtimentioning
confidence: 99%