2016
DOI: 10.1128/jcm.00630-16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Mycobacterial Growth Indicator Tube with Culture on RGM Selective Agar for Detection of Mycobacteria in Sputum Samples from Patients with Cystic Fibrosis

Abstract: dNontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) are an important cause of pulmonary disease in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF). A new culture medium (RGM medium) for the isolation of rapidly growing mycobacteria from the sputum of cystic fibrosis patients has recently been reported. The aim of this study was to compare culture of sputum samples on RGM medium with culture using a standard automated liquid culture method. Sputum samples were obtained from 187 distinct patients with CF attending King's College Hospital, Lo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
15
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
3
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the sensitivity of RGM30 with a 28-day incubation period was comparable to that of the MGIT system (P ϭ 0.6171) and Middlebrook 7H11 agar (P ϭ 0.3711) for the recovery of MABSC, RGM30 performed better for the recovery of all rapidly growing mycobacteria isolated in this study (P ϭ 0.0001). This finding was consistent with previous studies (14,15), demonstrating that RGM medium provided performance equivalent to that of the MGIT system or even better for the recovery of MABSC and other rapidly growing mycobacteria. Notably, the time to recovery of MABSC on RGM medium was comparable to the average time to positivity of MABSC on the MGIT system (ϳ4 days).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Although the sensitivity of RGM30 with a 28-day incubation period was comparable to that of the MGIT system (P ϭ 0.6171) and Middlebrook 7H11 agar (P ϭ 0.3711) for the recovery of MABSC, RGM30 performed better for the recovery of all rapidly growing mycobacteria isolated in this study (P ϭ 0.0001). This finding was consistent with previous studies (14,15), demonstrating that RGM medium provided performance equivalent to that of the MGIT system or even better for the recovery of MABSC and other rapidly growing mycobacteria. Notably, the time to recovery of MABSC on RGM medium was comparable to the average time to positivity of MABSC on the MGIT system (ϳ4 days).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…For slowly growing mycobacteria, RGM30 and RGM35 failed to recover 13 and 10 isolates of MAC, respectively, compared to the MGIT system (P Ͻ 0.05). The difference between RGM30 and the MGIT system for the recovery of MAC from clinical specimens had not been shown in previous studies (14,15). RGM medium showed potential as an alternative medium for recovery of mycobacteria, especially rapidly growing mycobacteria.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…BACTEC MGIT [50,51] measures microbial growth by oxygen depletion which requires anaerobic conditions, so the bacteria must be grown in a sealed tube or compartment. This method has been widely applied in medical diagnosis but is not suitable for high-throughput plate-based AST assays.…”
Section: Bactec Mgit Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%