2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2005.10.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of myocardial contrast echocardiography with SPECT in the evaluation of coronary artery disease in asymptomatic patients with LBBB

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[3][4][5][6][7] This also was shown in a smaller study comparing MCE and SPECT. 23 No difference in sensitivity between the 2 techniques was noted for the detection of CAD. However, because reversible defects (suggesting myocardial ischemia) occurred in only 57% of CAD patients, a significant proportion of patients undergoing SPECT would inadvertently be denied revascularization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[3][4][5][6][7] This also was shown in a smaller study comparing MCE and SPECT. 23 No difference in sensitivity between the 2 techniques was noted for the detection of CAD. However, because reversible defects (suggesting myocardial ischemia) occurred in only 57% of CAD patients, a significant proportion of patients undergoing SPECT would inadvertently be denied revascularization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…However, in a smaller study of asymptomatic LBBB patients who demonstrated predominantly normal LV function, the performance of MCE and SPECT for the detection of CAD was similar to our study. 23 The control group in our study was small, and multiple comparisons were performed, which may have led to a false-positive result. To minimize the possibility of type I error rate, we performed a 1-way ANOVA with post hoc adjustment for multiple comparisons with the Tukey method.…”
Section: Study Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Dobutamine stress echocardiography is a highly specific test (10,12), but sensitivity is moderate for septal ischemia in case of abnormal rest septal thickening (12). However, myocardial contrast echocardiography with adenosine seems to improve diagnostic accuracy (31). Finally, most studies excluded patients with a history of myocardial infarction or ventricular tachyarrhythmia or structural valve disease (10,12).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given that the development of perfusion defects are earlier than wall motion abnormalities in the ischaemic cascade, in theory the assessment of perfusion might increase the diagnostic accuracy of stress echocardiography. Karavidas et al compared adenosine stress echocardiography against SPECT and ICA [44]. This study was prospective, with 47 patients suspected of having CAD undergoing SPECT, then MCE 1-3 days later before having ICA within 1 week.…”
Section: Stress Echocardiographymentioning
confidence: 99%