2005
DOI: 10.1080/10618560500502519
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of near-wall treatment methods for high Reynolds number backward-facing step flow

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
15
0
4

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
15
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The above points have been concluded in studies that consider flow properties [28,29,31]. However, heat transfer prediction is quite sensitive to the near-wall modeling in impinging heat transfer, especially for the stagnation region [23], and the y þ requirement cannot be satisfied for the stagnation zone even if improved wall treatment methods are used [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The above points have been concluded in studies that consider flow properties [28,29,31]. However, heat transfer prediction is quite sensitive to the near-wall modeling in impinging heat transfer, especially for the stagnation region [23], and the y þ requirement cannot be satisfied for the stagnation zone even if improved wall treatment methods are used [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…A comparison of near-wall treatment methods for high-Reynolds-number backward-facing step flow was performed by Kim et al [28], and a similar study for zero-pressure gradient and obstacle flow was conducted by Salim and Cheah [29] with the FLUENT CFD package. The danger of overrefining the cells adjacent to the walls has been emphasized by Chila and Kaminski [30,31], and they have proposed a novel approach toward using an automated adaptation procedure for obtaining grid independence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ye J et al [2] established the k-ε-s model based on random turbulence theory and increased the precision of vortex length calculation. The studies of You X Y et al [3] and Kim J Y et al [4] compared and studied those models with various improvements. The computed recirculation length increased, but calculated pressure coefficient was still different from the tested data by about 20% when comparing the RKE & RNG model and the standard k-ε turbulence model (SKE).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, special treatment is required to solve for the wall-bounded flow field; a solution that also depends on the choice of RANS model that solves for the main flow field. Reliable results can be achieved via proper selection of both RANS and near-wall models (Kim et al 2005). Temperature profile in this region must be determined correctly for correct heat transfer calculation.…”
Section: Wall Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%