2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.mimet.2019.01.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Neisseria gonorrhoeae minimum inhibitory concentrations obtained using agar dilution versus microbroth dilution methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, antibiotics has to be supplied by specified manufacturers, making this method costly for screening. The broth dilution method is also highly accurate and comparable to agar dilution [ 24 ], and can test more than one antibiotic at one time. Broth microdilution method uses microdilution plates with a capacity of 500 μL/well to perform the broth dilution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, antibiotics has to be supplied by specified manufacturers, making this method costly for screening. The broth dilution method is also highly accurate and comparable to agar dilution [ 24 ], and can test more than one antibiotic at one time. Broth microdilution method uses microdilution plates with a capacity of 500 μL/well to perform the broth dilution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, agar plates containing antimicrobials have a limited shelf-life (no more than 5 days). 13 It is not feasible for laboratories that receive limited numbers of specimens or clinical laboratories that need to determine in time to perform AD tests routinely. An alternative method is E-test, for which antibiotic gradients have been applied to a plastic strip.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 Therefore, we neglected that the growth was partially refrained in some wells, causing an undistinguished decrease in turbidity by naked eyes. 13 Compared with manual judgement, the automatic process is labor-saving and objective. Additionally, the microplate reader machine can be replaced by an enzyme-labeled instrument or a nephelometer, which is used for other experiments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A range of doses from 10 to 0.00488 mg/mL were used. The MIC of every component along each microbe was specified as the lowest concentration of that component capable of inhibiting the development of the given microbe 14 , 37 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%