1994
DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1994.sp020416
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of neuronal nicotinic receptors in rat sympathetic neurones with subunit pairs expressed in Xenopus oocytes.

Abstract: 1. The agonist sensitivity of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors in rat superior cervical ganglion (SCG) neurones was compared with that of cloned receptors expressed in Xenopus oocytes by pairwise injections of a3-,B2 or a3-,B4 neuronal nicotinic subunit combinations. 2. Agonist responses in rat SCG neurones indicated that cytisine was the most potent agonist and lobeline the least potent (rank order of potency: cytisine > dimethylphenylpiperazinium iodide (DMPP) > nicotine > ACh > carbachol > lobeline). Dene… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

13
93
1

Year Published

1995
1995
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
13
93
1
Order By: Relevance
“…G-protein activation did not modify currents evoked by the cholinergic agonist, cytisine, which has been shown to be most potent for ␣3␤4 and ␣3␤4␣5 subunit combinations (Covernton et al, 1994). Furthermore, no direct interaction between the G o -protein subunits and the intracellular region of the ␤4 and ␣7 subunit was observed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…G-protein activation did not modify currents evoked by the cholinergic agonist, cytisine, which has been shown to be most potent for ␣3␤4 and ␣3␤4␣5 subunit combinations (Covernton et al, 1994). Furthermore, no direct interaction between the G o -protein subunits and the intracellular region of the ␤4 and ␣7 subunit was observed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…The problem is further compounded because the methods used to calculate the exponential components from gating mechanisms give little practical information about the relationships between specifi c components and states. For analytic solutions, which can be derived for models with a limited number of states, the relationship between components and states is obscured in the equations, as shown in the Appendix and Covernton et al, (1994) for a three state model, and in Hawkes (1977, 1981 ), Magleby and Pallotta (1983) , and Jackson (1997) for more complex models. For the numeric methods that can be used to solve any gating mechanism Hawkes, 1981, 1982), there is even less practical information about the contributions of specifi c states to the various exponential components because of the matrix specifi c constituent distribution { C 1 -(C 2 -C 1 ) n } for n = 0 to effectively infi nity (see below) was simulated with N × (P C1-C2 ) n × P C1-O1 random intervals of duration …”
Section: At E R I a L S A N D M E T H O D Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, only 5 of the 12 nAChR subunits (␣3, ␣5, ␣7, ␤2, and ␤4) are known to exist in autonomic ganglia (Mandelzys et al, 1994;Zhou et al, 1998;Devay et al, 1999;Nelson and Lindstrom, 1999;Erkman et al, 2000), and they are not distributed homogenously (Covernton et al, 1994;Klimaschewski et al, 1994;Poth et al, 1997;Sivilotti et al, 1997). Different nAChR subunit combinations are spatially segregated from each other in discrete membrane microregions relative to synapses (Horch and Sargent, 1995;Poth et al, 1997;Shoop et al, 1999).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%