2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.diii.2019.04.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of noise-magnitude and noise-texture across two generations of iterative reconstruction algorithms from three manufacturers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These changes were related to the increase in the iterative level and the use of a softer reconstruction kernel. However, these modifications changed the image texture, increasing image smoothness and reducing spatial resolution (21)(22)(23). Similar results were found by Macri et al on 133 consecutive dyspneic patients but with lower variations in image noise and CNR (17).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…These changes were related to the increase in the iterative level and the use of a softer reconstruction kernel. However, these modifications changed the image texture, increasing image smoothness and reducing spatial resolution (21)(22)(23). Similar results were found by Macri et al on 133 consecutive dyspneic patients but with lower variations in image noise and CNR (17).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…This comparison was performed on VMIs and iodine maps reconstructed only with Filtered Back Projection (FBP) using parameters and dose levels close to those used in clinical practice for DECT examinations of the abdomen. Spectral performance was studied using a task-based image quality assessment (noise magnitude, noise texture, spatial resolution and detectability of contrastenhanced lesions) often used in conventional single-energy CT (SECT) (13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22) and increasingly used in DECT (12,23,24). However, this study did not compare the spectral performance of these platforms with the use of IR (hybrid or advanced/partial Model-based IR) algorithms used in clinical practice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Iterative reconstruction (IR) was introduced in 2009 and has made several improvements since its inception. This reconstruction technique provides a significant improvement in image quality due to considerable noise reduction [ 29 , 30 , 31 ]. It has also been investigated for CT examinations of critically ill patients requiring immediate CT diagnostics [ 32 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%