2002
DOI: 10.4171/zaa/1104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Non-Commutative 2- and $p$-Summing Operators from $B(l_2)$ into $OH$

Abstract: In the theory of p-summing operators studied by Pietsch we know that π 2 (C(K), H) = π p (C(K), H) for any Hilbert space H and any p such that 2 < p < +∞. In this paper we prove that this equality is not true in the same notion generalized by Junge and Pisier to operator spaces, i.e. π l 2 (B(l 2), OH) (= π 0 2 (B(l 2), OH)) = π l p (B(l 2), OH).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As in the linear case (see [15]), we have a domination theorem similar to the commutative case which is appeared in [12, p. 57], the domination theorem is contained in [19,Theorem 14]. A proof of the general case, including vector-valued operators, can be found in [14,Proposition 3.1].…”
Section: Basic Definitions and Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…As in the linear case (see [15]), we have a domination theorem similar to the commutative case which is appeared in [12, p. 57], the domination theorem is contained in [19,Theorem 14]. A proof of the general case, including vector-valued operators, can be found in [14,Proposition 3.1].…”
Section: Basic Definitions and Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…We recall that π l p (X, Y ) is the space of all l p -summing operators from an operator space X into a Banach space Y . For more information on this notion we refer the reader to [Mez02]. In fact, Theorem 2.3 and [Mez02, Theorem 2.3] give us the following characterization result.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Using this notion we prove some properties of multilinear operators in the non-commutative case. Our motivation is that the adjoint of a strongly l p -summing m-linear operator is an l p -summing operator as studied in [Mez02]. This paper is organized as follows.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations