2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2016.02.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of nonwoven glass and stainless steel microfiber media in aerosol coalescence filtration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At pseudosteady state, the pressure drop can be expressed as: ΔPnormalw=ΔP0[]1.09αZdnormalf0.561U0μσcosθ0.477 (where U 0 is filtration velocity), which is mainly determined by surface wettability and filter structure. The above equations suggest that filter material, structure, fiber/fabric dimension, surface wettability, oil type, and droplet size all contribute to the filtration performance …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At pseudosteady state, the pressure drop can be expressed as: ΔPnormalw=ΔP0[]1.09αZdnormalf0.561U0μσcosθ0.477 (where U 0 is filtration velocity), which is mainly determined by surface wettability and filter structure. The above equations suggest that filter material, structure, fiber/fabric dimension, surface wettability, oil type, and droplet size all contribute to the filtration performance …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, the Knudsen number for helium flow through the metal foams would be of an order of approximately 10 , which is also insignificant. Other data obtained for stainless steel fibres by Manzo et al [19] has an order of magnitude of 10 for , which results in the Knudsen number for air and helium flow being of the order of magnitude 10 and 10 , respectively. Since foams are considered to fall under the category of fibres and not granular media [20], it can therefore be concluded that the Klinkenberg effect can affect the SSA results for foams of small enough diameter, i.e.…”
Section: Fluid Phase Dependence Due To the Klinkenberg Effectmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…4 are those obtained from substituting eqn (29) into the Dietrich and RUC formulations, i.e. eqns (19) and (25), respectively. Due to the results of the Huu formulation not performing well when compared to the Dietrich and RUC formulations, the Huu formulation was not added in this investigation of fluid phase effects on the SSA results.…”
Section: Fluid Phase Dependence Due To the Klinkenberg Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each medium the deviation in measured permeability is calculated on the basis of the sample thickness deviation. The last filter (named Medium C) has been characterized and studied by Manzo et al (2016) for the removal of liquid aerosol by coalescence filtration. It consists of five sheets of a medium made of stainless steel fibres, of 2.0 mm thickness.…”
Section: Experimental Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Properties of the studied fibrous media (data on the stainless steel medium obtained from Manzo et al (2016)).…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 99%