2014
DOI: 10.1080/03610918.2013.809098
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Novelty Score-Based Multivariate Control Charts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Univariate control charts monitor a single quality characteristic, whereas multivariate control charts monitor one or more quality characteristics. Multivariable control charts can be used in order to examine the relationships between quality characteristics and control the multiple quality dimensions in one chart [6]. Multivariate control charts can be more effect in detecting the out-of-control processes than the traditional ones.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Univariate control charts monitor a single quality characteristic, whereas multivariate control charts monitor one or more quality characteristics. Multivariable control charts can be used in order to examine the relationships between quality characteristics and control the multiple quality dimensions in one chart [6]. Multivariate control charts can be more effect in detecting the out-of-control processes than the traditional ones.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If a charting statistic is below or above the control limits, a process is considered as out of control. If the process is desired to be in an in‐control state, then corrective action is necessary (Tuerhong & Kim, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They proposed the use of the novelty scores of OCC algorithms as the monitoring statistics of a control chart. OCCbased control charts have performed better than their alternatives in many nonnormal cases (Tuerhong et al, 2014;Kim et al, 2011;Sukchotrat et al, 2010;Sun and Tsung, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%