2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.04.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of ocular biomechanical response parameters in myopic and hyperopic eyes using dynamic bidirectional applanation analysis

Abstract: Proprietary or commercial disclosures are listed after the references.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, in WEM-t short-group, IOPcc and mean GAT-IOP were included (AICc = 39.23) instead of CH (AICc = 40.18). This is probably because IOPcc is closely associated with CH 35 , 36 , but also associated with IOP level at the time of measurement (Asaoka R, et al . IOVS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, in WEM-t short-group, IOPcc and mean GAT-IOP were included (AICc = 39.23) instead of CH (AICc = 40.18). This is probably because IOPcc is closely associated with CH 35 , 36 , but also associated with IOP level at the time of measurement (Asaoka R, et al . IOVS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may be because the magnitude of elevation of IOP when an eye is deformed in response to air pulse application may be related to the visco-elasticity of the cornea and sclera, considering IOPcc is designed to compensate for corneal properties[ 35 ] and is highly correlated with CH. [ 51 , 52 ] bIOP, not only adjusted for CCT and age, but also for cornea curvature at HC (personal communication with Oculus) may represent some aspects of corneal visco-elasticity, though the HCE measurement calculated using bIOP was not significantly related to mTD progression rate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…33 The Ocular Response Analyzer (Reichert, Inc., Depew, New York, NY, USA) uses an airjet to measure corneal hysteresis to monitor disease progression by direct measurement of in vivo corneal stiffness. 34 Measurements of corneal hysteresis can be dependent on corneal hydration, thickness, and intraocular pressure, 35,36 thereby limiting the utility of the device in some patients. A new technique described by Vinciguerra and colleagues 37 using the Corvis ST (Oculus Optikgeräte GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany) was shown to be accurate in identifying keratoconic eyes from normal eyes through a new biomechanical measure called the Corvis Biomechanical Index.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%