2016
DOI: 10.4103/0974-9233.194080
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of olive tipped and conventional steven′s cannula for sub-tenon ophthalmic anesthesia

Abstract: PURPOSE:To compare the efficacy of the olive tipped (OT) cannula to the conventional Steven's cannula for sub-Tenon block (STB) before cataract surgery.METHODS:This prospective, randomized, double-masked compared STB delivered in cataract surgery patients with an OT cannula or a conventional Steven's cannula (ST). Outcome variables included the akinesia score and lid movement scores at 5 and 10 min. The patient perception of pain during delivery of the STB and surgery were also compared between groups. Surgeon… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…23 of Middle East African Journal of Ophthalmology[1], the name of the author “Waleed Riad” is mentioned in the Acknowledgement section instead it should be mentioned in the authors' names section. The affiliation of the author should read correctly as follows:…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…23 of Middle East African Journal of Ophthalmology[1], the name of the author “Waleed Riad” is mentioned in the Acknowledgement section instead it should be mentioned in the authors' names section. The affiliation of the author should read correctly as follows:…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the article titled “Comparison of Olive Tipped and Conventional Steven's Cannula for Sub-Tenon Ophthalmic Anesthesia”, which appeared in the pages 307-310, issue 4, vol. 23 of Middle East African Journal of Ophthalmology[ 1 ], the name of the author “Waleed Riad” is mentioned in the Acknowledgement section instead it should be mentioned in the authors' names section. The affiliation of the author should read correctly as follows:…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%