Comparison of one-anastomosis gastric bypass and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for treatment of obesity: a 5-year study

Bhandari, Mohit; Nautiyal, Hemant Kumar; Kosta, Susmit; Mathur, Winni; Fobi, Mathias

doi:10.1016/j.soard.2019.05.025

Cited by 62 publications

(31 citation statements)

References 20 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Severe hypoalbuminemia was maximum in the MGB group, seen in longer bypasses, i.e., >250 cm (done in our early experience, often for super-obesity), which caused increased protein malabsorption. With RYGB, DeFilipp et al (29) found that longer bypasses led to more macronutrient deficiency.…”

Section: The Main Results Of the Study Were As Followingmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparative Study Between Single Anastomosis Sleeve Ileal Bypass and Minigastric Bypass and Their Effect on Haemoglobin, Albumin, Calcium and Folate

Moustafa

Said

Alfouly

et al. 2020

Ain Shams Medical Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: The Main Results Of the Study Were As Followingmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparative Study Between Single Anastomosis Sleeve Ileal Bypass and Minigastric Bypass and Their Effect on Haemoglobin, Albumin, Calcium and Folate

Moustafa

Said

Alfouly

et al. 2020

Ain Shams Medical Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Single anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) was described by Rutledge in 1997 and introduced in 2001 as a simple, effective and safe alternative to RYGB [ 7 ]. In the last 15 years, different studies have been reported on the advantages of this technique over the Roux-en-Y bypass [ [8] , [9] , [10] ], however, there is an intense debate regarding complications, early and late [ 19 ].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Now a days, only a few texts in which complications after OAGB are documented, comparing to those related with RYGB [ 8 , 9 ]. It has been demonstrated that certain technique endpoints are key to the success of these procedures, the size of the gastric pouch, the length of the biliary loop and digestive loop [ 10 ].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Conversion from mini bypass to laparoscopic Roux en Y gastric bypass in an emergency setting: Case report and literature review

Galaz¹,

Rico²,

Lopez-Acosta³

et al. 2020

International Journal of Surgery Case Reports

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Moreover, 30-day mortality was 0.03% in the same study 22 . Only Kular, with his analysis on 1054 patients who underwent MGB, found a lower rate for this complication (0.1%) 29 25 . 33.…”

Section: Bmi and Laboratory Changes 6 Months After Operationmentioning

confidence: 97%

Comparative Study Between Sleeve Gastrectomy With Single Anastomosis Duodeno-Ileal Bypass and Mini-Gastric Bypass in Management of Morbid Obesity.

AliElsayed¹,

ijar²,

MohamedAbdElLatif³

et al. 2019

IJAR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Many surgical procedures have been proposed for management of morbid obesity. This study was conducted aiming to compare between the outcomes of open loop duodenal switch (DS) and laparoscopic minigastric bypass (MGB) procedures. Study type: Prospective comparative study. Patient and methods: 50 patients were included in the study. They were divided into 2 groups; group 1 included 25 patients who underwent open loop DS while group 2 included 25 patients who underwent laparoscopic minigastric bypass. All patients were subjected to complete history taking, physical examination, and routine investigations. Lipid profile and diabetic status were also assessed. After discharge, patients were followed up at 3, 6, and 12 months after the procedures where weight, BMI, and laboratory investigations were assessed in each visit. Results: The mean age of the included patients was 34.76 for the DS group and 36.0 years for MGB group. In each group, 20 females (80%) as well as 5 males (20%) were included. The mean BMI of the included patients was 52.59 and 51.6 kg/m 2 for both groups respectively. No significant difference was detected between the two groups regarding preoperative albumin, lipid profile, or HbA1c levels. Mean patient weight decreased postoperatively to 128.92, 117.63, and 105.28 kg after 3, 6, and 12 months in DS group. In the MGB group, mean weight decreased to 133.75, 124.14, 117.16 kg at the same time intervals respectively. BMI decreased to 48.45, 43.01, and 38.27 kg/m 2 in DS group while in the other group it showed a decrease down to 49.35, 46.89, and 42.33 kg/m 2 at the previously reported time intervals in order of speech. It was evident that 6-and 12-month changes were significantly better in Ds group compared to MGB group (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Based on the results of the current study, it was evident that both open loop duodenal switch and laparoscopic minigastric bypass procedures are effective in the management of morbid obesity and its related comorbidities. However, loop DS operation is more effective in weight loss compared to MGB.

show abstract

Comparison of one-anastomosis gastric bypass and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for treatment of obesity: a 5-year study

Cited by 62 publications

References 20 publications

Comparative Study Between Single Anastomosis Sleeve Ileal Bypass and Minigastric Bypass and Their Effect on Haemoglobin, Albumin, Calcium and Folate

Comparative Study Between Single Anastomosis Sleeve Ileal Bypass and Minigastric Bypass and Their Effect on Haemoglobin, Albumin, Calcium and Folate

Conversion from mini bypass to laparoscopic Roux en Y gastric bypass in an emergency setting: Case report and literature review

Comparative Study Between Sleeve Gastrectomy With Single Anastomosis Duodeno-Ileal Bypass and Mini-Gastric Bypass in Management of Morbid Obesity.

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About