2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2013.09.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of open-air and semi-enclosed cultivation system for massive microalgae production in sub-tropical and temperate latitudes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After 6 days, when cultures achieved the stationary phase, the microalgae were collected from the photobioreactors for use in the flocculation experiments. In a previous study, Roselet et al [20] cultured N. oculata year-round in an outdoor open system without CO 2 addition and the culture presented a pH naturally ranging from 6 to 8. Therefore, to investigate the influence of pH on flocculant efficiency, three pH values (5, 7, and 9) were tested 30 min after adjustment using 0.5 mol L -1 HCl or 0.5 mol L -1 NaOH solutions.…”
Section: Effect Of Ph Salinity Biomass Concentration and Aommentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After 6 days, when cultures achieved the stationary phase, the microalgae were collected from the photobioreactors for use in the flocculation experiments. In a previous study, Roselet et al [20] cultured N. oculata year-round in an outdoor open system without CO 2 addition and the culture presented a pH naturally ranging from 6 to 8. Therefore, to investigate the influence of pH on flocculant efficiency, three pH values (5, 7, and 9) were tested 30 min after adjustment using 0.5 mol L -1 HCl or 0.5 mol L -1 NaOH solutions.…”
Section: Effect Of Ph Salinity Biomass Concentration and Aommentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be grown in wastewater (Uggetti, Sialve, Trably & Steyer, 2014) and in petrol production water (Arriada & Abreu, 2014). Recently, these microalgae have been widely used in several studies on biofuel production at the Microalgae Production Laboratory from the Aquaculture and Marine Biotechnology Center in the Oceanographic Institute of the Federal University of Rio Grande (Arriada & Abreu, 2014;do Valle Borges, de Farias, Odebrecht & de Abreu, 2007; L. Borges, Mor on-Villarreyes, D'Oca & Abreu, 2011;Roselet, Maic a, Martins & Abreu, 2013;Roselet, Vandamme, Roselet, Muylaert & Abreu, 2015;Sales & Abreu, 2014).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indoor RWPs have the disadvantage of receiving nearly 20% less transmission of light. However, overall indoor RWPs have been found to have higher productivity due to partial control over salinity and temperature [34].…”
Section: Choice Of Locationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, it prevents decrease in salinity and dilution of biomass due to rain fall and precipitation and increase in the salinity due to evaporation of water during the summer time. Further, in the winter season, indoor RWPs enjoy relatively higher culture temperature (nearly 4 1C) than the outside environment [34]. Indoor RWPs have the disadvantage of receiving nearly 20% less transmission of light.…”
Section: Choice Of Locationmentioning
confidence: 99%