2017
DOI: 10.3183/npprj-2017-32-01-p098-110
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of optical instruments for fines and filler characterisation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fines cover several length scales (nm to μm) which relates to their rather arbitrary definition, namely, to pass a 200 mesh screen (that corresponds to holes with a diameter of 76 μm). , While the TAPPI definition considers the capability of fibrous matter to pass a mesh, in optical image analysis fines are classified according to the length of the particles. Particles having a length shorter than 200 μm are commonly referred to as fines . Therefore, simple structure–property relationships are challenging to establish, and the effect of the fines on the properties of paper, for instance, is still not fully understood. ,, While it is known that the fibrillar portion of the fines seems to increase mechanical strength of paper, higher fines contents in paper relate to more tedious dewatering procedures due to higher water retention values.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Fines cover several length scales (nm to μm) which relates to their rather arbitrary definition, namely, to pass a 200 mesh screen (that corresponds to holes with a diameter of 76 μm). , While the TAPPI definition considers the capability of fibrous matter to pass a mesh, in optical image analysis fines are classified according to the length of the particles. Particles having a length shorter than 200 μm are commonly referred to as fines . Therefore, simple structure–property relationships are challenging to establish, and the effect of the fines on the properties of paper, for instance, is still not fully understood. ,, While it is known that the fibrillar portion of the fines seems to increase mechanical strength of paper, higher fines contents in paper relate to more tedious dewatering procedures due to higher water retention values.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Particles having a length shorter than 200 μm are commonly referred to as fines. 18 Therefore, simple structure−property relationships are challenging to establish, and the effect of the fines on the properties of paper, for instance, is still not fully understood. 9,10,19 While it is known that the fibrillar portion of the fines seems to increase mechanical strength of paper, higher fines contents in paper relate to more tedious dewatering procedures due to higher water retention values.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%