2013
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0066846
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Optical Quality and Intraocular Scattering after Posterior Chamber Phakic Intraocular Lens with and without a Central Hole (Hole ICL and Conventional ICL) Implantation Using the Double-Pass Instrument

Abstract: PurposeTo objectively compare the optical quality and the intraocular scattering after implantation of the posterior chamber phakic implantable collamer lens (Visian ICL™, STAAR Surgical) with and without a central artificial hole for moderate to high ametropia.MethodsThis retrospective study comprised 28 eyes of 28 consecutive patients undergoing Hole ICL implantation (mean age ± standard deviation, 30.3±5.8 years), and 24 age-matched eyes of 24 patients undergoing conventional ICL implantation (age, 30.4±6.1… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

4
49
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
4
49
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been previously demonstrated through studies using the optical quality analysis system that the hole ICL implantation appeared to be essentially equivalent in the optical quality variables to conventional ICL implantation, suggesting that the presence of the central artificial hole did not significantly affect the optical quality and the intraocular scattering after surgery 21. The contrast sensitivity following ICL as demonstrated by Igarashi et al did not significantly change, while there was a definite reduction in contrast after FS-LASIK 22.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…It has been previously demonstrated through studies using the optical quality analysis system that the hole ICL implantation appeared to be essentially equivalent in the optical quality variables to conventional ICL implantation, suggesting that the presence of the central artificial hole did not significantly affect the optical quality and the intraocular scattering after surgery 21. The contrast sensitivity following ICL as demonstrated by Igarashi et al did not significantly change, while there was a definite reduction in contrast after FS-LASIK 22.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Cette plateforme permet l'analyse de toute atteinte de la transparence des milieux oculaires en quantifiant la diffusion de la lumière avec l'indice OSI. Elle a été ainsi utilisée pour l'étude de la qualité de vision après de la chirurgie réfractive par Lasik et Lasek par Lee et al [19], par PRK et Lasik par Ondategui et al [20], après la mise en place d'un ICL par Kamiya et al [21] ou pour quantifier la diffusion lumineuse lors d'uvéites par Nanavaty et al [22].…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…The subjects were in part composed of those in the preceding report on the clinical outcomes of ICL implantation 7. As stated in our previous study, the inclusion criteria for these surgical techniques in our institution were as follows: unsatisfactory correction with spectacles or contact lenses, 20≤age≤50 years, stable refraction for at least 6 months, −3.00 to −15.0 dioptres (D) of myopia with astigmatism of 2.25 D or less, anterior chamber depth ≥2.8 mm, ECD≥1800 cells/mm 2 , no history of ocular surgery, corneal degeneration, cataract, glaucoma or uveitis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%