2017
DOI: 10.3928/00989134-20161109-05
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Oral Assessment Results Between Non-Oral and Oral Feeding Patients: A Preliminary Study

Abstract: In the current study, evaluation and comparison of oral status was performed to confirm the necessity of oral care for non-oral feeding patients. The study involved patients consulting an attending physician in one hospital's Department of Dentistry for oral care. Based on the feeding method, participants were divided into two groups: (a) non-oral (n = 66) and (b) oral (n = 66) feeding. Characteristics and Oral Assessment Guide scores were compared between groups. The non-oral feeding group had significantly w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The statistical differences remained significant after adjusting for FIM total score and age in the multivariate model. Oral health tends to diminish easily in patients with non‐oral feeding or dysphagia 44,45 . The findings of our study are consistent with those of previous reports on the significant association of oral health and oral feeding status in stroke patients admitted to a rehabilitation unit.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The statistical differences remained significant after adjusting for FIM total score and age in the multivariate model. Oral health tends to diminish easily in patients with non‐oral feeding or dysphagia 44,45 . The findings of our study are consistent with those of previous reports on the significant association of oral health and oral feeding status in stroke patients admitted to a rehabilitation unit.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Matsuo et al [ 30 ] divided patients receiving palliative care into two groups based on days to death and compared the oral health between the two groups; the shorter prognosis group had a higher incidence of oral health problems such as glossitis and dry mouth and a higher proportion of patients with dysphagia who required oral care. Ohno et al [ 31 ] reported poorer oral health in inpatients receiving non-oral nutrition than in those receiving oral nutrition and noted that, in particular, speech, swallowing, saliva, and the tongue were significantly worse. Previous reports and the present study revealed that prognostic level, in terms of days to death and nutritional intake status, had a negative effect on oral health.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, it is suitable for convalescent hospitals because it can evaluate abnormalities in items that affect oral intake, such as dental pain and the condition of the natural teeth and dentures, which are not included in the OAG. Ohno et al investigated the relationship between oral feeding and oral health status using OAG [6], targeting patients in acute care hospitals. The majority of the subjects in the study were hospitalized for pneumonia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a previous study [6], the oral status of an oral feeding group and a non-oral feeding group in an acute hospital was compared using the oral assessment guide (OAG) [7]. Results showed that the non-oral feeding group had significantly lower voice, swallowing, saliva, and tongue related OAG scores than the feeding group in the unadjusted analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%