2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2006.09.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of paclitaxel penetration in normal and cancerous cervical model monolayer membranes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
27
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, the structures adopted by the parts of a membrane protein that are located in the lipid head group region are determined, in part, by hydrogen bonding to the head groups. 50 The findings about the interaction of GBP and LEV with glycerol backbone and head groups of lipids may indicate that they have the potential to change structure, relatively function, of peripheral proteins. Similarly, the localization of these drugs within hydrophobic core of bilayer may also suggest that they have the potential to change transmembrane segments of integral proteins.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, the structures adopted by the parts of a membrane protein that are located in the lipid head group region are determined, in part, by hydrogen bonding to the head groups. 50 The findings about the interaction of GBP and LEV with glycerol backbone and head groups of lipids may indicate that they have the potential to change structure, relatively function, of peripheral proteins. Similarly, the localization of these drugs within hydrophobic core of bilayer may also suggest that they have the potential to change transmembrane segments of integral proteins.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The changes in the biophysical characteristics of the membrane, such as the lipid packing density and membrane fluidity, are known to influence the membrane’s transport properties 7, 40. The lower drug uptake seen in resistant cells than in sensitive cells (Figure 9) thus could, in part, be related to the relatively higher packing density and lower fluidity of the resistant cell membrane lipids than the sensitive cell membrane lipids.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, it was observed that the incorporation of paclitaxel into the 1,2-dipalmitoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DPPC) bilayer induced a reduction in the cooperativity of the phase transition, which translates into the fluidizing effect that the compound exerts in the membrane [71]. Preetha et al evaluated the penetration profile of paclitaxel in monolayers of normal and cancerous cervical membranes and compared it with a DPPC monolayer [74]. It was observed that due to differences in lipid composition, which in turn affect membrane fluidity, the drug's penetration profile was different between normal and cancer membrane.…”
Section: Studies Using Dsc and Langmuir Isotherms Demonstrated That Pmentioning
confidence: 97%