Comparison of paired quartz OSL and feldspar post-IR IRSL dose distributions in poorly bleached fluvial sediments from South Africa

Abstract

A comparative study using quartz optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) and feldspar post-infrared infrared stimulated luminescence (post-IR IRSL) was undertaken on Quaternary fluvial sediments from an unnamed tributary of the Moopetsi River in South Africa. The aim is to assess whether the post-IR IRSL signal can be used to date incompletely bleached sediments. Several post-IR IRSL signals using varying stimulation and preheat temperatures were investigated; of these the post-IR IRSL225 signal was deemed most appropriate for dating because it bleached most rapidly. The feldspar post-IR IRSL225 equivalent dose (De) values from this site are consistently larger than those from quartz OSL, probably due to differences in the bleaching characteristics of the two signals. Additionally, the post-IR IRSL225 De values within a sample showed less variation in precision than the quartz De data, possibly due to greater averaging between grains in the feldspar small aliquots. The agreement between ages based on the OSL and post-IR IRSL225 signals was better for younger samples (<20 ka) than for older ones (>50 ka); the cause of this variation is unclear

Age of a prehistoric “Rodedian” cult site constrained by sediment and rock surface luminescence dating techniques

“…This argument is based on the widely-observed differential bleaching rates of quartz and feldspar signals (e.g. Godfrey-Smith et al, 1988;Thomsen et al, 2008;Buylaert et al, 2012;Murray et al, 2012;Sugisaki et al, 2015;Colarossi et al, 2015) when exposed to a daylight spectrum, and helps to quantitatively address one of the main uncertainties in the application of OSL to dating.…”

Timing of fluvial sedimentation in the Upper Rhine Graben since the Middle Pleistocene: constraints from quartz and feldspar luminescence dating

“… and references therein; Colarossi et al . ). Alternatively, several models have been proposed to correct faded ages (e.g.…”

Optical dating of loessic hillslope sediments constrains timing of prehistoric rockfalls, Christchurch, New Zealand

“…Several studies have shown that the quartz OSL signal resets faster than the K‐feldspar IR 50 signal and that the IR 50 signal, in turn, bleaches more rapidly than the elevated temperature pIRIR signals (e.g. Godfrey‐Smith et al ., ; Thomsen et al ., ; Murray et al ., ; Kars et al ., ; Colarossi et al ., ; Möller and Murray, ; Sugisaki et al ., ). Based on this, Murray et al .…”