2004
DOI: 10.1051/agro:2004033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of parameter estimation methods for crop models

Abstract: International audienceCrop models are important tools in agronomic research, a major use being to make predictions. A proper parameter estimation method is necessary to ensure accurate predictions. Until now studies have focused on the application of a particular estimation method and few comparisons of different methods are available. In this paper, we compare several parameter estimation methods, related, on the one hand, to model selection, and on the other, to ridge regression based on an analogy to a Baye… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…At the field level, only agronomic predictive models using the appropriate biogical and environmental parameters [210] should be able to take into account interactions between plants and their environment to obtain an integrated view of the various inputs or outputs, influencing crop NUE [211,212]. One of the main challenges in the future will be to develop reliable decision support systems with the help of sensors [213,214] and biological diagnostic tools in precision agriculture, in order to optimize the application of N under organic or conventional conditions in a more sustainable manner.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the field level, only agronomic predictive models using the appropriate biogical and environmental parameters [210] should be able to take into account interactions between plants and their environment to obtain an integrated view of the various inputs or outputs, influencing crop NUE [211,212]. One of the main challenges in the future will be to develop reliable decision support systems with the help of sensors [213,214] and biological diagnostic tools in precision agriculture, in order to optimize the application of N under organic or conventional conditions in a more sustainable manner.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It must be noticed that for a given number of parameters , the penalization term is constant regardless of which parameters are estimated. Tremblay and Wallach (2004) have attested that BICC performs better than classic BIC both in terms of mean squared error of the parameter estimates and in terms of prediction error.…”
Section: Modification Of the Bayesian Information Criterion For Smallmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that there are many choices in this model selection step. Other advanced model selection methodologies, e.g., the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (lasso) (Tibshirani, 1996), the smoothly clipped absolute deviation (SCAD) (Fan, 1997), the adaptive lasso (Zou, 2006), the least-angle regression algorithm (LARS) (Efron, Hastie, Johnstone & Tibshirani, 2004), the Dantzig selector (Candes & Tao, 2007), or another kind of selection criteria, e.g., the Akaike information criterion (AIC) (Akaike, 1974), the Corrected Akaike information criterion (AICc) (Hurvich & Tsai, 1993), the Corrected Bayesian information criterion (BICc) (Tremblay & Wallach, 2004), the significance of each individual variable criterion; can be applied here. Note that each association rule can be converted into only one interaction.…”
Section: The Proposed Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%