2009
DOI: 10.1017/s0021859609990050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of parametric and non-parametric methods for analysing genotype×environment interactions in safflower (Carthamus tinctoriusL.)

Abstract: SU MMARYGenotyperenvironment interaction (GEI) is a major factor in the development of stable and highyielding safflower cultivars under rain-fed conditions. In order to quantify GEI effects on the seed yield of 17 safflower genotypes and to identify stable genotypes, multi-environment yield trials (multienvironment trials (MET)) were conducted for four consecutive years in 33 different environments (year-location combinations) during 2003-06. The results indicated that GEI was significant using the Hildebrand… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
20
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
4
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The presence of significant GEI for grain yield of the intermediate maturing maize cultivars demonstrated the need for the extensive testing of cultivars in multiple environments over years and the need to identify high-yielding and stable cultivars. This result is in agreement with the findings of earlier workers (BaduApraku et al 2003;Sabaghnia et al 2008;Moghaddam and Pourdad 2009). The high proportion of 63.5% contributed by environments to the total variation in grain yield, 32.8% contributed by GEI and low (3.5%) contribution by genotypes fall within the range reported by earlier workers (Fakorede and Adeyemo 1986;Badu-Apraku et al 2003, 2011aMohammadi et al 2009).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The presence of significant GEI for grain yield of the intermediate maturing maize cultivars demonstrated the need for the extensive testing of cultivars in multiple environments over years and the need to identify high-yielding and stable cultivars. This result is in agreement with the findings of earlier workers (BaduApraku et al 2003;Sabaghnia et al 2008;Moghaddam and Pourdad 2009). The high proportion of 63.5% contributed by environments to the total variation in grain yield, 32.8% contributed by GEI and low (3.5%) contribution by genotypes fall within the range reported by earlier workers (Fakorede and Adeyemo 1986;Badu-Apraku et al 2003, 2011aMohammadi et al 2009).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…These results are consistent with the findings of Badu-Apraku et al (2011) and. The presence of significant E × Cultivar and E × Era mean squares for grain yield and most measured traits under multiple stress and non-stress environments indicated differential responses of the genotypes and the need to identify high-yielding and stable cultivars across environments, as reported by Sabaghnia et al (2008); Moghaddam and Pourdad, (2009). This result confirmed the need for extensive testing of cultivars in multiple environments, including location and years before cultivar recommendations are made in the subregion (Badu-Apraku et al, 2011, 2015b.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…DISCUSSION In the present study, significant mean squares were detected for G, E, and GEI for most measured traits under drought stress, low N, and in optimal growing conditions and across environments indicating that the test environments were unique and that there was adequate genetic variability among the early yellow hybrids to allow good progress from selection for improvements in most of the traits (Badu-Apraku et al, 2011b;Akinwale et al, 2014). Furthermore, the significant GEI suggested differential responses of the genotypes and the need to identify high-yielding and stable genotypes across test environments (Sabaghnia et al, 2008;Moghaddam and Pourdad, 2009). The presence of a highly significant GEI for grain yield and most measured traits of the early yellow hybrids is a confirmation of the need for extensive testing of cultivars in multiple environments before cultivar recommendations are made.…”
Section: Comparison Of the Efficiency Of The Heterotic Grouping Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%