2023
DOI: 10.4162/nrp.2023.17.3.503
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of participant and non-participant perceptions on healthy restaurant for sodium reduction: a qualitative study

Jeehee Pyo,
Mina Lee,
Yunjeong Jang
et al.

Abstract: BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES In the Republic of Korea, “Healthy Restaurant for Sodium Reduction (HRSR)” project have been designated as one of the representative policies for sodium intake reduction. However, as of 2021, only 879 restaurants, less than 0.1% of all restaurants, had been designated. Therefore, to increase the participation of restaurants in this policy, it is necessary to examine the in-depth perception and experience of participants and non-participants in the HRSR. MATERIA… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 21 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our findings align with a recent study in New York City, where Latin American restaurant owners identified healthy menu options as green salads, vegetarian alternatives, and seafood [23]. In contrast, several studies in Asian countries focused on cooking methods, such as sodium reduction in IORs, found that owners paid attention to the healthfulness of less strongly flavored foods rather than the overall composition of a meal [33,34].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Our findings align with a recent study in New York City, where Latin American restaurant owners identified healthy menu options as green salads, vegetarian alternatives, and seafood [23]. In contrast, several studies in Asian countries focused on cooking methods, such as sodium reduction in IORs, found that owners paid attention to the healthfulness of less strongly flavored foods rather than the overall composition of a meal [33,34].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%