1986
DOI: 10.1136/jcp.39.6.680
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of passive haemagglutination test with Widal agglutination test for serological diagnosis of typhoid fever in an endemic area.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
2

Year Published

1988
1988
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
16
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…1 We excluded all cases in whom diagnoses of typhoid fever were confirmed by the results of the Widal tests, despite the fact that the background antibody titers among healthy subjects in this area are very low and few are vaccinated with typhoid-paratyphoid vaccine. 36 This is because we could not exclude the possibility of any difference that may exist between males and females 37 in terms of background antibody titers, degree of specific anamnestic response, maximum antibody titer, generation of nonspecific cross-reactive antibody, or a combination thereof. Furthermore, when one considers the entire study population and each sex group separately, serologically diagnosed cases were found to differ from blood culture-positive cases in terms of certain clinical features, laboratory findings, and complications (Khan M and others, unpublished data).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 We excluded all cases in whom diagnoses of typhoid fever were confirmed by the results of the Widal tests, despite the fact that the background antibody titers among healthy subjects in this area are very low and few are vaccinated with typhoid-paratyphoid vaccine. 36 This is because we could not exclude the possibility of any difference that may exist between males and females 37 in terms of background antibody titers, degree of specific anamnestic response, maximum antibody titer, generation of nonspecific cross-reactive antibody, or a combination thereof. Furthermore, when one considers the entire study population and each sex group separately, serologically diagnosed cases were found to differ from blood culture-positive cases in terms of certain clinical features, laboratory findings, and complications (Khan M and others, unpublished data).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results of the Widal test have demonstrated to vary between different areas and in time, due to variation in background levels as well as a result of variation in the quality of the antigen. [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] The need for a rapid and inexpensive laboratory test for early and accurate diagnosis of patients with typhoid fever has prompted the exploration of a variety of serologic and antigen detection methods, including counter immunoelectrophoresis, 13,14 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), [15][16][17][18] dot immunoassay, 16,[19][20][21] hemagglutination, 22 and coagglutination. 23 However, these assays are not very easy to perform, not rapid, require special equipment or skills, or depend on electricity and on refrigeration for storage of components.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two studies indicated that the passive haemagglutination test (70% sensitive and 92% specific) is comparable with the Widal test [17,18]. Recently, a novel microplate agglutination assay using the absorbed sheep red blood cells to enhance the Widal test reactivity appeared to be a useful alternative technique (19).…”
Section: Diagnosis Methods Of Typhoid Fevermentioning
confidence: 99%