2023
DOI: 10.21037/jtd-23-214
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of patient-reported outcomes and clinical outcomes between pleurectomy and pleural covering added to thoracoscopic bullectomy for primary spontaneous pneumothorax

Abstract: Background An optimal surgical procedure for primary spontaneous pneumothorax (PSP) has not yet been established. The study aimed to compare patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and clinical outcomes between parietal pleurectomy (pleurectomy) and visceral pleural covering with absorbable prosthesis (covering) added to thoracoscopic bullectomy in patients with PSP. Methods From January 2015 to April 2018, PROs were prospectively evaluated using EuroQOL-5 dimensions-5 levels … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 20 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Pneumothorax is categorized as spontaneous pneumothorax and non-spontaneous such as traumatic with iatrogenic or no iatrogenic etiology [ 8 ]. Spontaneous pneumothorax is further divided into primary and secondary subtypes [ 9 , 10 ]. Primary spontaneous pneumothorax (PSP) occurs in patients with no obvious lung disease, while secondary spontaneous pneumothorax frequently occurs in elderly people with underlying lung conditions [ 11 , 12 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pneumothorax is categorized as spontaneous pneumothorax and non-spontaneous such as traumatic with iatrogenic or no iatrogenic etiology [ 8 ]. Spontaneous pneumothorax is further divided into primary and secondary subtypes [ 9 , 10 ]. Primary spontaneous pneumothorax (PSP) occurs in patients with no obvious lung disease, while secondary spontaneous pneumothorax frequently occurs in elderly people with underlying lung conditions [ 11 , 12 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%