2023
DOI: 10.1007/s00432-023-05020-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of PD-L1 expression and MMR status between primary and matched metastatic lesions in patients with cervical cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 43 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, there can be discordance in PD-L1 status between primary and metastatic lesions 96, 108 . One study found an inconsistency rate of 33.0% in PD-L1 expression between primary and recurrent/metastatic lesions 109 . Another study found that the concordance of PD-L1 positivity between primary and metastatic tumors was moderate with one assay (22C3), but poor with another (SP142) 110 .…”
Section: Addressing Pd-l1 Testing Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, there can be discordance in PD-L1 status between primary and metastatic lesions 96, 108 . One study found an inconsistency rate of 33.0% in PD-L1 expression between primary and recurrent/metastatic lesions 109 . Another study found that the concordance of PD-L1 positivity between primary and metastatic tumors was moderate with one assay (22C3), but poor with another (SP142) 110 .…”
Section: Addressing Pd-l1 Testing Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%