2013 6th International Conference on Human System Interactions (HSI) 2013
DOI: 10.1109/hsi.2013.6577824
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of perceptual features efficiency for automatic identification of emotional states from speech

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, we extracted the most popular and most used acoustic features in the SER field, which include the MFCC, Energy, and their first-order derivatives, using open-source media interpretation by large feature-space extraction (openSMILE) [51]. Several studies have used MFCC acoustic features for speech emotion recognition [52][53][54]. We also considered those acoustic features as a baseline to evaluate our acoustic features.…”
Section: Acoustic Feature Extraction and Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, we extracted the most popular and most used acoustic features in the SER field, which include the MFCC, Energy, and their first-order derivatives, using open-source media interpretation by large feature-space extraction (openSMILE) [51]. Several studies have used MFCC acoustic features for speech emotion recognition [52][53][54]. We also considered those acoustic features as a baseline to evaluate our acoustic features.…”
Section: Acoustic Feature Extraction and Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper Mel Frequency Cepstral Coefficients (MFCC), Bark Frequency Cepstral Coefficients (BFCC), Perceptual Linear Prediction Coefficients (PLP) and Revised Perceptual Linear Prediction Coefficients (RPLP), were taken into consideration. Perceptual approach in emotion recognition is presented in [25].…”
Section: Speech Signal Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cepstral Coefficients (BFCC) and Mel-frequency Cepstral Coefficients (MFCC) [15] with a clean dataset. Hidden Markov Model (HMM) [11] is implemented using Hidden Markov Toolkit (HTK) [12].…”
Section: Revised Perceptual Linear Prediction (Rplp) Bark Frequencymentioning
confidence: 99%