2008
DOI: 10.2113/jeeg13.3.291
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Performance of Airborne Magnetic and Transient Electromagnetic Systems for Ordnance Detection and Mapping

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The cluster of small artifacts at the lower right corner of the Tran site (Figure 2) is missed by the G i à analysis because these artifacts are too small and/or deeply buried to be detected by the EM-63. These results are similar to those of Beard et al (2008) in that small buried objects were missed because they fall below the threshold of EM-63 detection. This cluster was detected by the magnetometer, however, as a dipolar anomaly (Figure 4).…”
Section: Tran Control Sitesupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The cluster of small artifacts at the lower right corner of the Tran site (Figure 2) is missed by the G i à analysis because these artifacts are too small and/or deeply buried to be detected by the EM-63. These results are similar to those of Beard et al (2008) in that small buried objects were missed because they fall below the threshold of EM-63 detection. This cluster was detected by the magnetometer, however, as a dipolar anomaly (Figure 4).…”
Section: Tran Control Sitesupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Aeromagnetic exploration is an important method used in geophysical prospecting, especially in mineral exploitation, underground unexploded ordnance detection, and underwater target detection [ 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 ]. Compared with surface and satellite magnetic surveys, aeromagnetic exploration has huge advantages in terms of resolution, efficiency, and security [ 5 , 6 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%