2022
DOI: 10.4274/haseki.galenos.2022.8104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes and Urethral Complications Between Using 24-French and 26-French Resectoscope Sheaths in Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a study comparing 26-F and 28-F resectoscopes in terms of urethral complications, the morcellation efficiency was found in favor of the 28-F resectoscope (4.8 g/min vs. 3.6 g/min, p=0.07) [ 18 ]. In another study comparing 24-F and 26-F resectosopes, the morcellation efficiency was found to be statistically significantly superior in the 26-F group (6.5 g/min vs. 5.5 g/min, p=0.003) [ 19 ]. In our study, it was determined that the size of the resectoscope was one of the statistically significant factors affecting the morcellation efficiency.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a study comparing 26-F and 28-F resectoscopes in terms of urethral complications, the morcellation efficiency was found in favor of the 28-F resectoscope (4.8 g/min vs. 3.6 g/min, p=0.07) [ 18 ]. In another study comparing 24-F and 26-F resectosopes, the morcellation efficiency was found to be statistically significantly superior in the 26-F group (6.5 g/min vs. 5.5 g/min, p=0.003) [ 19 ]. In our study, it was determined that the size of the resectoscope was one of the statistically significant factors affecting the morcellation efficiency.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%