Comparison of perioperative outcomes between endoscope-assisted technique and handheld acoustic Doppler for perforator identification in fasciocutaneous flaps

Abstract

The endoscopic technique has been utilized to harvest muscle flaps and detect perforators of fasciocutaneous flaps. This study aimed to compare the perioperative outcomes between the endoscope-assisted technique and handheld acoustic Doppler for perforator identification in fasciocutaneous flaps.This retrospective case-control study included patients who underwent fasciocutaneous flap reconstruction for traumatic soft tissue defects. In the case group, perforator identification was assisted by the endoscope-assisted technique. In the control group, age- and sex-matched patients received handheld acoustic Doppler to detect perforators. Perioperative outcomes, flap characteristics, and postoperative complications were compared.There were 12 patients in the case group and 12 in the control group. Compared with the control group, the case group had a significantly shorter length of donor-site wounds (9 cm vs 12 cm, P = .023) and a significantly smaller proportion of patients receiving skin grafting at the donor sites (0% vs 41.7%, P = .037). The case group had a longer operative time, but the difference was not statistically significant (180 minutes vs 150 minutes, P = .367). The amount of blood loss, the time length of postoperative drainage, and complications did not significantly differ between the 2 groups.The endoscope-assisted technique for perforator identification of fasciocutaneous flaps provided less donor-site morbidity and a significantly shorter length of donor-site wounds than the conventional handheld acoustic Doppler, which suggests that this technique could be a valuable alternative when a precise design is indicated.