2014
DOI: 10.3311/ppch.7120
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of pervaporation models with simulation of hybrid separation processes

Abstract: Abstract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be determined that the highest part of install cost is membrane modules and the utility cost of heat exchangers are the most significant part of total annual cost. This statement is consistent with other hybrid methods [7,41].…”
Section: Cost Estimationsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…It can be determined that the highest part of install cost is membrane modules and the utility cost of heat exchangers are the most significant part of total annual cost. This statement is consistent with other hybrid methods [7,41].…”
Section: Cost Estimationsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Pervaporation (PV) is selected for investigation of ethanol from aqueous mixtures. Pervaporation has more green specialties against to other traditional processes, such as distillation [9,10]. There are simply actualization, energy-saving and no-pollution effects, furthermore no need for extra material to add for the separation [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the complexity and duration of surveys and measurements of the performance of real industrial facilities in research related to the development or improvement of methods of obtaining the finished product, numerical methods and software complexes that implement them are often used [1][2][3]. Typically, to simulate the modes of technological lines researchers use software systems that allow you to calculate the material and thermal balances of these lines, namely ChemCAD, Aspen HYSYS, MATLAB, Mathcad and others [4][5][6].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%