1989
DOI: 10.1002/jcla.1860030305
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of phenotyping and genotyping of lymphoid neoplasms

Abstract: Comparison of phenotyping (PT) and genotyping (GT) of lymphoid neoplasms was performed on 51 specimens including lymph nodes, bone marrows, and body fluids. PT was performed with a flow cytometer using a large monoclonal antibody panel. GT included the testing for gene rearrangements of heavy chain, kappa and lambda light chains, and T-cell receptor beta-chain genes with DNA probes. The results obtained from these two techniques were generally compatible in terms of clonality and cell lineage. Only one case of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1993
1993
1999
1999

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently introduced molecular biological methods have raised hopes for an improved detection level in residual cancer. Among such methods, the Southern Blot gene rearrangement analysis has been found to allow for the identification of a clonal cell infiltration constituting between 1% and 5% of the bone marrow (28), whereas the routinely used single-colour IP has a sensitivity of about 5% due to lack of leukaemia-specific monoclonal antibodies (29). The PCR technique has an even higher degree of sensitivity (about 1 : lo5), but has some inherent pitfalls and cannot be utilized in the absence of specific primers (30).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently introduced molecular biological methods have raised hopes for an improved detection level in residual cancer. Among such methods, the Southern Blot gene rearrangement analysis has been found to allow for the identification of a clonal cell infiltration constituting between 1% and 5% of the bone marrow (28), whereas the routinely used single-colour IP has a sensitivity of about 5% due to lack of leukaemia-specific monoclonal antibodies (29). The PCR technique has an even higher degree of sensitivity (about 1 : lo5), but has some inherent pitfalls and cannot be utilized in the absence of specific primers (30).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9,[29][30][31][32][33] In the immunohistochemistry study by Picker et al, the inciThis study was supported in part by a research grant from the Gonryo Medical Foundation, and presented at the Symposium dence of loss of pan-T cell antigen in T-LBL was only 26%, while our study detected UCP-L in 20 of 21 cases (95%) in 35th Congress of Japanese Society of Reticuloendothelial System, Niigata, Japan, 11-12 June 1995. We are grateful to because dim positivity of CD45 and CD5 and/or bright positivity of CD7 on the lymphoma cells was easily detected by Dr Masahide Abe, Dr Takanori Aonuma, Dr Toshikazu Awataguchi, Dr Raul C Braylan, Dr Fumio Endo, Dr Kazuyasu Endo, 3-FCM.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%