2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.solmat.2018.12.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of photovoltaic module luminescence imaging techniques: Assessing the influence of lateral currents in high-efficiency device structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, we measure threefold lower luminescence intensity from the nonilluminated region for this weathered cell (on average 2.4 ± 0.8 times lower for cells in the degraded vs control modules at this laser fluence). This lower contactless EL amplitude occurs despite similar luminescence intensities in the illuminated region (on average 1.0 ± 0.4 between weathered vs control modules) . This results in a difference in a luminescence pattern between the weathered and control modules, where the weathered module has a higher luminescence ratio of illuminated to nonilluminated regions, and the higher ratio is primarily caused by the lower contactless EL.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…However, we measure threefold lower luminescence intensity from the nonilluminated region for this weathered cell (on average 2.4 ± 0.8 times lower for cells in the degraded vs control modules at this laser fluence). This lower contactless EL amplitude occurs despite similar luminescence intensities in the illuminated region (on average 1.0 ± 0.4 between weathered vs control modules) . This results in a difference in a luminescence pattern between the weathered and control modules, where the weathered module has a higher luminescence ratio of illuminated to nonilluminated regions, and the higher ratio is primarily caused by the lower contactless EL.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Partial illumination of photovoltaic cells induces lateral currents that have important practical implications for laser‐based luminescence screening of photovoltaic modules. In particular, line‐scan photoluminescence (PL) and contactless electroluminescence (EL) are increasingly employed for module quality inspection, and both techniques rely on subcell illumination patterns rather than full, homogeneous illumination . Line‐scan PL is designed to measure the luminescence signal from cell regions coincident with the laser, making this technique particularly useful for in‐line screening .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations