2022
DOI: 10.1007/s40368-022-00734-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of physical and mechanical properties of three different restorative materials in primary teeth: an in vitro study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it is available in powder and liquid forms. The restorative material obtained from the mixing of powder and liquid as per manufacturer's recommendation can polymerise itself or can be light activated to polymerise [ 16 ]. Considering the lesser chair side time available for restorations of pediatric patients, Cention N can be a better choice over composite.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, it is available in powder and liquid forms. The restorative material obtained from the mixing of powder and liquid as per manufacturer's recommendation can polymerise itself or can be light activated to polymerise [ 16 ]. Considering the lesser chair side time available for restorations of pediatric patients, Cention N can be a better choice over composite.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the one hand, RMGIC is a time-tested material with good clinical performance, and on the other hand, Cention N claims better anticariogenic and mechanical properties. Previous in vitro studies comparing Cention N to resin modified GIC evaluated parameters such as fluoride releasing ability, antibacterial property, flexural strength, and microleakage [ 5 , 16 19 ]. Our study compared the compressive strength, shear bond strength, and flexural strength of Cention N and RMGIC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is supported by an early study on curing kinetics, which shows that the same degree of conversion can be achieved regardless of the curing mechanism [ 27 ]. Additionally, a study on the mechanical properties of Cention N showed statistically similar FS [ 47 ] for light-cured and self-cured specimens, while another study even showed significantly higher FS for self-cured specimens [ 48 ]. In the latter two studies, the FS of Cention N (after storage at neutral pH) amounted to 83–86 MPa [ 47 ] and 62–83 MPa [ 48 ], which is much lower than the FS values reported for the newer encapsulated version (Cention), i.e., above 100 MPa [ 19 ], and the FS values of the latest version (Cention Forte) in the present study (108–140 MPa).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, a study on the mechanical properties of Cention N showed statistically similar FS [ 47 ] for light-cured and self-cured specimens, while another study even showed significantly higher FS for self-cured specimens [ 48 ]. In the latter two studies, the FS of Cention N (after storage at neutral pH) amounted to 83–86 MPa [ 47 ] and 62–83 MPa [ 48 ], which is much lower than the FS values reported for the newer encapsulated version (Cention), i.e., above 100 MPa [ 19 ], and the FS values of the latest version (Cention Forte) in the present study (108–140 MPa). Although the compositional modifications made during the development of the alkasite have not been disclosed by the manufacturer, the modifications to improve flexural strength usually involve an increase in the amount of filler and/or modifications in particle size geometry, generally contributing to reduced mobility of the resin monomers at the micro-scale, ultimately diminishing the efficiency of curing [ 49 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%