2017
DOI: 10.5194/isprs-archives-xlii-2-w7-765-2017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Pixel-Based and Object-Based Classification Using Parameters and Non-Parameters Approach For the Pattern Consistency of Multi Scale Landcover

Abstract: ABSTRACT:Information extraction from remote sensing data especially land cover can be obtained by digital classification. In practical some people are more comfortable using visual interpretation to retrieve land cover information. However, it is highly influenced by subjectivity and knowledge of interpreter, also takes time in the process. Digital classification can be done in several ways, depend on the defined mapping approach and assumptions on data distribution. The study compared several classifiers meth… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Object-based image analysis uses spectral and spatial information to assign pixels into objects based on characteristics such as tone, size, shape, texture, patterns and the association between objects to assign a class. Object-based image analysis has been reported to be more accurate compared to pixel-based approaches (Esetlili et al, 2018;Jawak et al, 2018;Juniati and Arrofigoh, 2017). However, this depends on various factors such as the nature of the landscape, classification scheme, satellite sensor type and algorithms used to perform the actual analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Object-based image analysis uses spectral and spatial information to assign pixels into objects based on characteristics such as tone, size, shape, texture, patterns and the association between objects to assign a class. Object-based image analysis has been reported to be more accurate compared to pixel-based approaches (Esetlili et al, 2018;Jawak et al, 2018;Juniati and Arrofigoh, 2017). However, this depends on various factors such as the nature of the landscape, classification scheme, satellite sensor type and algorithms used to perform the actual analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are two different approaches for image analysis namely pixel-wise and object-based (Castillejo-González et al, 2009;Lei et al, 2016;Lu, Weng, 2007). Pixel-wise image analysis method classifies each individual pixel to their most probable thematic class (Castillejo-González et al, 2009;Juniati, Arrofiqoh, 2017;Li et al, 2014;Weih, Riggan, 2010). Whereas, object-based image analysis first segments the image and classifies those individual segments to most appropriate thematic classes considering on spatial, spectral, geometrical and textural attributes (Blaschke, 2010;Weih, Riggan, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In many cases software and computational tools such as ERDAS and Khoros 2.2 were used [17]. eCognition and ArcGIS softwares are recent examples in this case [8,21]; Traditional hand-crafted feature extraction and discrimination techniques for object classification in remote sensing was reviewed in [22]. When using low resolution images such as Landsat 8, appropriate choice of training samples, segmentation parameters and modelling strategy is important.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When using low resolution images such as Landsat 8, appropriate choice of training samples, segmentation parameters and modelling strategy is important. That is a challenge in using software-based strategies and limit their accuracy [21]. An example in this case is selection of a suitable segmentation scale to avoid over and under segmentation in Object Based Image Analysis OBIA.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation