2012
DOI: 10.1007/s10950-012-9297-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of point and array-computed rotations for the TAIGER explosions of 4 March 2008

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Alternatively, the seismogeodetic method [Bodin et al, 1997;Spudich et al, 1995;Spudich and Fletcher, 2008] may be used to derive rotational ground motion from translation recordings at the surface [e.g., Suryanto et al, 2006;Kendall et al, 2012;Pham et al, 2012]. This method requires, however, detailed knowledge of 3-D subsurface structure.…”
Section: Measuring Rotational Ground Motionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Alternatively, the seismogeodetic method [Bodin et al, 1997;Spudich et al, 1995;Spudich and Fletcher, 2008] may be used to derive rotational ground motion from translation recordings at the surface [e.g., Suryanto et al, 2006;Kendall et al, 2012;Pham et al, 2012]. This method requires, however, detailed knowledge of 3-D subsurface structure.…”
Section: Measuring Rotational Ground Motionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the vertical component of rotational ground motion can be approximated via finite differences from translational recordings at the surface, a similar approximation of the horizontal components would require borehole seismometers that are mostly unavailable. Alternatively, the seismogeodetic method [Bodin et al, 1997;Spudich et al, 1995;Spudich and Fletcher, 2008] may be used to derive rotational ground motion from translation recordings at the surface [e.g., Suryanto et al, 2006;Kendall et al, 2012;Pham et al, 2012]. This method requires, however, detailed knowledge of 3-D subsurface structure.…”
Section: Measuring Rotational Ground Motionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We see that they are much more similar to each other than in Figure 14, especially ∆v z /∆y (green curves), i.e., the best ADR estimate (but still far from being accurate) can be expected for Ω x (axis in the N-S direction). (6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20) Hz) finite differences, ∆v x /∆y (blue), ∆v y /∆x (green), x-axis pointing to the North, y-axis pointing to the West. The large dots mark the stations in the array (see Figure 2).…”
Section: Velocity Records and Velocity Spatial Gradientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an overwhelming majority of seismic rotational data are records of motions very weak in amplitude, such experiments should be focused on that rather than on strong motion records. To verify Rotaphone data for weak events, we designed a comparative in-field experiment (inspired by the paper by Kendall et al [ 19 ]). The experiment consisted in comparing Rotaphone records with those from the Eentec R-1 rotational sensor and the array-derived-rotation (ADR) data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ring laser gyroscopes are capable of measuring torsional rates at a precision of 10 −10 rad/s [ Igel et al , ], but are unaffordable for the seismology community to deploy extensively [ Lee et al , ]. Medium‐priced rotational sensors, e.g., eentec R1 with a nominal precision of 10 −6 rad/s, however, have not proven reliable in faithfully recording broadband rotational motions [ Kendall et al , ; Wassermann et al , ]. Alternatively, coseismic rotations can be indirectly measured using a dense seismic array according to linear elasticity theory by presuming a spatially uniform rotational pattern over the extent of the array [e.g., Huang , ; Spudich et al , ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%