1998
DOI: 10.4141/s97-073
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of porosity in a Chernozemic clay loam soil under long-term conventional tillage and no-till

Abstract: Comparison of porosity in a Chernozemic clay loam soil under long-term conventional tillage and no-till. Can. J. Soil Sci. 78: 619-629. Tillage practice can alter soil structure, porosity and the size distribution of pores. Consequently, this study was conducted to compare the long-term (since 1968) effects of conventional tillage (CT) using a heavy-duty cultivator and no-till (NT) on structure and porosity of a Dark Brown Chernozem (clay loam) soil in southern Alberta. Number and porosity of total, round, int… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Pagliai et al (2004), a plow pan was formed in the 20-25 cm layer under CT as the macroporosity <10 %. Similar results were found in Pagliai et al (1995) (silt loam soil, 10 years experiment) and Miller et al (1998) (clay loam soil, 24 years experiment). Under CT treatment, tillage operations formed unstable macropores in the upper layer, decreased macroporosity in the lower layer, and a plow pan was observed.…”
Section: Soil Porosity and Pore Structuresupporting
confidence: 92%
“…According to Pagliai et al (2004), a plow pan was formed in the 20-25 cm layer under CT as the macroporosity <10 %. Similar results were found in Pagliai et al (1995) (silt loam soil, 10 years experiment) and Miller et al (1998) (clay loam soil, 24 years experiment). Under CT treatment, tillage operations formed unstable macropores in the upper layer, decreased macroporosity in the lower layer, and a plow pan was observed.…”
Section: Soil Porosity and Pore Structuresupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Tillage treatment was also a significant factor of K variability for the highest matric potentials (≥−0.1 kPa) but not for the lowest matric potentials (Table 3) indicating that tillage had mainly affected macropores (Miller et al, 1998;Kribaa et al, 2001;Wahl et al, 2004). At the beginning of May (set 1), the global geometric mean of K S under conventional tillage was higher than under conservation tillage (71 vs. 44 mm h − 1 ).…”
Section: Effectmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Furthermore, primary tillage operation was done in November under conservation tillage and it was done much later (in April) under conventional tillage. As indicated by Miller et al (1998), the timing of tillage events relative to the measurements has a strong influence on K(h) data. It may completely mask short-term tillage effects.…”
Section: Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, soil samples impregnated with resin containing fluorescent dye were cut into thin sections, and images of ultraviolet light were analyzed to classify the pore space and quantify the structure (Ringrose-Voase, 1996). The effects of tillage (CT versus NT) on soil structure and porosity have also been studied using ultraviolet-dye-impregnated thin sections of a clay loam (Miller et al, 1998).…”
Section: Soil Hydraulic Properties and Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%