1995
DOI: 10.1016/0376-7388(94)00256-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of potentiometric enzyme sensors for urea and penicillin-G: differential thick-film sensors versus classical electrodes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The enzyme can be immobilized on the outer surface or captured inside the membrane. Penicillinase was immobilized on the surface of a glass pH electrode and the enzymatically formed penicilloic acid changed the pH in the interface [183][184][185].…”
Section: Potentiometric Biosensorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The enzyme can be immobilized on the outer surface or captured inside the membrane. Penicillinase was immobilized on the surface of a glass pH electrode and the enzymatically formed penicilloic acid changed the pH in the interface [183][184][185].…”
Section: Potentiometric Biosensorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The biological recognition element of a biosensor interacts selectively with the target analyte, assuring the selectivity of the sensor. A number of biosensors using enzymes to determine penicillin G were reported (Eppelsheim et al, 1995;Leszczynska et al, 1998;Liu et al, 1998;Stred'ansky et al, 2000). However, limits of detection of these enzyme-based biosensors are in the 10 −3 to 10 −6 M range, higher than the MRL.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%