2020
DOI: 10.5455/njppp.2020.10.07207202031072020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of practice and attitude of self-treatment in rural and urban population in Uttarakhand, India: A comparative study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
5
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This observation is incongruent with the results reported by studies in India, where higher SMA was found among urban respondents than among their rural counterparts [9]. In another study, more SMA was found among respondents in rural than in urban localities [18]. Our study, therefore, reveals the need to focus equally on strategies to reduce SMA practices in both rural and urban settings.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 92%
“…This observation is incongruent with the results reported by studies in India, where higher SMA was found among urban respondents than among their rural counterparts [9]. In another study, more SMA was found among respondents in rural than in urban localities [18]. Our study, therefore, reveals the need to focus equally on strategies to reduce SMA practices in both rural and urban settings.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 92%
“…The findings were similar to another study that stated a 50% rise in surfing time during the COVID-19 pandemic [ 17 ]. A study by Kalyani et al showed that participants spent over half an hour searching for information related to COVID-19 each day during the pandemic [ 18 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Section III consists of 27 items to assess practice of nurses for nosocomial infection control. [ 18 ] Research tool validity was done by seven experts from field of neonatology and nursing with CVR (0.68) and CVI (0.88) scores. Reliability score of 0.9 shows excellent reliability in research tools, so tools were found reliable, clear, relevant and appropriate.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%