2007
DOI: 10.1002/qsar.200630019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Predictivities of Log P Calculation Models Based on Experimental Data for 134 Simple Organic Compounds

Abstract: Predictivities of six log P calculation models (CLOGP, KOWWIN, ACD/LOGP, SLOGP, VLOGP and COSMO thermo) are compared using a common experimental dataset, which does not contain any of the compounds used in the training set for the six models. The former three models, which are based on fragment methods, showed better accuracy (r ¼ 0.87 -0.91) than SLOGP, which is based on the atom contribution method and VLOGP and COSMO thermo, which are property-based models. The trends of prediction by each model are describ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(12 reference statements)
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the different nature of the hydrophilic and lipophilic phases used in the two systems ( n -octanol: water for the theoretically calculated values and methanol-water: nujol for the RPTLC experiment) must be considered. It is difficult to obtain reliable experimental logP values outside the range of about 5 < logP < 7; therefore, it is likely that a calculated logP value using a model is more accurate than an experimental [42].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the different nature of the hydrophilic and lipophilic phases used in the two systems ( n -octanol: water for the theoretically calculated values and methanol-water: nujol for the RPTLC experiment) must be considered. It is difficult to obtain reliable experimental logP values outside the range of about 5 < logP < 7; therefore, it is likely that a calculated logP value using a model is more accurate than an experimental [42].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The atomic increments for the calculation of log P values (where P is the octanol/water partition coefficient) were taken as measures of these hydrophobicities: OH, À1.4; S, À0.4; NH 3 + , À4.6. [50,51] They clearly reflect the greater hydrophobicity of the sulfur linker and the much lower hydrophobicity of the ammonium group compared to the hydroxyl group. The influence of hydrophilic end groups on the host seems to level off with increasing spacer length, since binding free energies of derivatives 8, 11, 12, and 14 with C 2 spacers are very similar despite their different end groups.…”
Section: Determination Of Binding Thermodynamics Between Hosts and Gumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An in silico analysis (ADME/Tox) was done to predict some properties of the novel diNsGF derivatives (Table 1). The properties that have values within the acceptable ranges are: (i) logP o/w , which estimates how the behavior of each molecule will be in terms of lipophilicity [20] and permeability though the membrane [21]; (ii) logS, which indicates the drug transport, uptake, and bioavailability [22]; (iii) human oral absorption, and (iv) logKp (skin permeability), which indicates possibilities of administration and effects on bioavailability [23], a risk assessment of hazardous chemicals, and measurements of transdermal drug release rates [24,25]. The relevance of in silico ADME/Tox assays is that these theoretical features help to delimit the space within which there is a greater probability of finding compounds with a tendency to achieve a successful clinical development [26].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%