2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.07.1669
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of pregnancy outcomes in anonymous shared versus exclusive donor oocyte in vitro fertilization cycles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
6
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
3
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In agreement with our findings, most studies found that recipients who received higher number of oocytes have higher chances of freezing embryos [14]. Recently, Mullin et al compared exclusive and shared donor oocyte cycles and found no significant differences in clinical pregnancy rate among both types of donations; [13] however, and in agreement with our findings the group that received all the oocytes retrieved had a significantly greater number of cryopreserved embryos.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In agreement with our findings, most studies found that recipients who received higher number of oocytes have higher chances of freezing embryos [14]. Recently, Mullin et al compared exclusive and shared donor oocyte cycles and found no significant differences in clinical pregnancy rate among both types of donations; [13] however, and in agreement with our findings the group that received all the oocytes retrieved had a significantly greater number of cryopreserved embryos.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…This issue was the focus of several publications on egg sharing policies, and none of them showed that receiving more oocytes led to better reproductive outcomes [13,14]. Most allocation policies vary from a minimum of 4 oocytes to larger number such as 8 or 10 oocytes to each recipient.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar to Mullin et al, they did not fi nd any statistically signi fi cant difference in pregnancy or miscarriage rate in patients who had received 4, 5, 6, 7, and ³ 8 mature oocytes. Such results lend credence to the practice of sharing donors [ 27,28 ] . Despite comparable fresh pregnancy rates from shared and exclusive donor oocyte cycles, investigators in both studies did note a signi fi cant difference in the average number of excess good-quality embryos available for cryopreservation [ 27,28 ] .…”
Section: Are There Factors That Impact Upon the Success Of A Frozen Dsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…A shared donor oocyte program offers a solution to this "egg ef fi ciency" problem. Our group recently performed a retrospective analysis to examine whether there is a difference in pregnancy outcomes between women undergoing a shared ( n = 656) versus exclusive ( n = 225) donor oocyte cycles and did not fi nd a difference in the clinical pregnancy rates among these groups [ 27 ] . Although the exclusive group had signi fi cantly more oocytes (19.5 vs. 11.6) and fertilized embryos (11.9 vs. 7.3) when compared with the shared group, the pregnancy rates were quite similar (58 % vs. 56 %).…”
Section: Are There Factors That Impact Upon the Success Of A Frozen Dmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Oocyte donors underwent standard controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and oocyte retrieval [4]. Oocyte recipients were given estradiol, 6 mg orally per day to thicken the endometrium.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%