2010
DOI: 10.1007/s10584-010-9914-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of preparatory signal analysis techniques for consideration in the (post-)Kyoto policy process

Abstract: Our study is a preparatory exercise. We focus on the analysis of uncertainty in greenhouse gas emission inventories.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We analyze emissions in the Annex B countries and their time series in consideration of uncertainty. Our analysis is based on the Undershooting and Verification Time concept described by Jonas et al (2010). Emission inventory reports of the Annex B parties were used for this analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…We analyze emissions in the Annex B countries and their time series in consideration of uncertainty. Our analysis is based on the Undershooting and Verification Time concept described by Jonas et al (2010). Emission inventory reports of the Annex B parties were used for this analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By meeting the modified target, the country reduces the aforementioned risk of unintended overshooting (see Fig. 3 in Jonas et al 2010). The introduced undershooting encompasses an initial or obligatory undershooting, where necessary, to make sure that the countries' emission signals become detectable (i.e., that they exceed the emissions' total uncertainty at a given point in time: here, at the time of commitment) before the countries are permitted to make economic use of their excess emission reductions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations