2019
DOI: 10.1155/2019/3743028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Presplit and Smooth Blasting Methods for Excavation of Rock Wells

Abstract: To understand differences of smooth and presplit blasting for the excavation of rock wells, two field experiments using these two techniques are implemented at the same test site, respectively. The ground vibrations induced by them have been monitored with the different distances through the corresponding devices. The vibration results illustrate that at the same monitoring distance and direction, peak particle velocities and dominant frequencies of vibration signals based on presplit blasting are both apparen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
12
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…By monitoring the model casting units, we found that the maximum casting velocity appeared at the middle of the blast-hole pack, with a velocity of 21.6 m/s. Additionally, this value is consistent with the conclusion regarding the maximum casting velocity proposed by Huang et al [36,37], which is 18-28 m/s. e average scattering distance is approximately 47 m, the postcracking distance is approximately 1.2 m, and the casting rate is approximately 34%.…”
Section: Casting State Of Motionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…By monitoring the model casting units, we found that the maximum casting velocity appeared at the middle of the blast-hole pack, with a velocity of 21.6 m/s. Additionally, this value is consistent with the conclusion regarding the maximum casting velocity proposed by Huang et al [36,37], which is 18-28 m/s. e average scattering distance is approximately 47 m, the postcracking distance is approximately 1.2 m, and the casting rate is approximately 34%.…”
Section: Casting State Of Motionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Furthermore, the boreholes were fully charged [4][5][6], and this is not always in line with the practices of deep rock blasting. In fact, in deep mining, the charging in a number of boreholes is decoupled, especially in presplit blasting, smooth blasting, buffer blasting, and some production blasting [42][43][44], but few papers can be found to study the rock fracturing in blasting with a decoupled charge under high in situ stress.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aforementioned studies of permeability evolution of fractured rock are limited in the quasistatic condition. Actually, rocks or rock masses are usually subject to cyclic disturbances, which probably come from earthquake, mining, and tunneling [25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34]. A large amount of studies suggested that cyclic loading can lead to severe fatigue damage or failure of rock even when the stress level is significantly lower than the static strength [35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%