2020
DOI: 10.1080/02656736.2020.1849824
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of procedure-related complications between percutaneous cryoablation and radiofrequency ablation for treating periductal hepatocellular carcinoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…556 However, cryoablation has been reported to have a lower complication rate compared to RFA in treating HCCs located near the bile duct or intrahepatic vessels. 557,558 In the limited RCTs and meta-analyses mentioned above, microwave ablation and cryoablation showed similar results in terms of the OS, recurrence rate, and major complication rate compared to RFA. Currently, in South Korea, the cost of cryoablation is higher than that for RFA.…”
Section: Microwave Ablation and Cryoablationmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…556 However, cryoablation has been reported to have a lower complication rate compared to RFA in treating HCCs located near the bile duct or intrahepatic vessels. 557,558 In the limited RCTs and meta-analyses mentioned above, microwave ablation and cryoablation showed similar results in terms of the OS, recurrence rate, and major complication rate compared to RFA. Currently, in South Korea, the cost of cryoablation is higher than that for RFA.…”
Section: Microwave Ablation and Cryoablationmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…556 However, cryoablation has been reported to have a lower complication rate compared to RFA in treating HCCs located near the bile duct or intrahepatic vessels. 557,558 In the limited RCTs and meta-analyses mentioned above, microwave ablation and cryoablation showed similar results in terms of the OS, recurrence rate, and major complication rate compared to RFA. Currently, in South Korea, the cost of cryoablation is higher than that for RFA.…”
Section: Microwave Ablation and Cryoablationmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In their metanalysis, Wu et al found no difference in 6-month mortality and local tumor progression between patients who underwent CrA versus RFA for hepatic malignancies [ 9 ]. Similarly, for RFA and MWA, it should be taken into account that CrA can be redone [ 30 , 31 , 32 ], as we reported in the current series, whereas redo CrA was carried out for local tumor progression or local recurrence in 16% of cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%