Comparison of progress of labour and maternofetal outcome among induced versus spontaneous labour in nulliparous women using modified WHO partograph

Singh, Anamika; Rao, Smitha B.; Sherigar, Bhavana; Dsouza, Renita Priya; Soumya, R; Kaveri, Vismaya

doi:10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20180049

Cited by 5 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The mean APGAR score of the newborn in the spontaneous group was about 8.1, whereas the mean APGAR score in the induced group was 7, which shows that the newborn of the induced group. This was in contrast to the findings of the study conducted by Singh et al 8 The studies conducted by patel et al and Yadav et al who showed that there was no significant difference in the APGAR scores of the two groups. 9,10 Incidence of PPH also higher in induced group as compare to spontaneous group.…”

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 99%

A comparative study of spontaneous versus induced labor in primi and multiparous women at tertiary care centre

Damor

Chavhan²

2022

Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Objectives of the study were to compare progression of spontaneous versus induced labor in primigravida and multigravida women.Methods: Pregnant women admitted in labor room of RNT medical college Udaipur during January 2021 to June 2021 were selected for this study. A total of 200 pregnant women were selected and divided into two groups. Women in group A were induced while in group B were women with spontaneous onset of labour. Labor progression in both was compared.Results: In group A, the mean duration of active phase in primigravida was 4.08+2.30 hr. In group A, the mean duration of the second stage in a primigravida was 25.5+8.15 min and in a multigravida was 17.38+9.95 min. In group B,the mean duration of second stage in a primigravida was 41.3+9.6 min, while in a multigravida was 22.72+6.2h. The mean duration of active phase in group A in the primigravida and multigravida was almost similar, showing that induction does not have any effect on the duration of active phase. The mean duration of the second stage of group A in primigravida was 25 min and multigravida were 17 min showing that induction reduces the duration of the second stage.Conclusions: Induction of labor when done at the right gestational age for correct indication is beneficial to women as it reduces the complications caused due to the continuation of high-risk pregnancies.

show abstract

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 99%

A comparative study of spontaneous versus induced labor in primi and multiparous women at tertiary care centre

Damor

Chavhan²

2022

Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The mean APGAR score of the newborn in the spontaneous group was about 8.1, whereas the mean APGAR score in the induced group was 7, which shows that the newborn of the spontaneous group has a better score than the newborn of the induced group. This was in contrast to the findings of the study conducted by Singh et al [8]. The studies conducted by Patel et al [9] and Yadav et al [10] who showed that there was no significant difference in the APGAR scores of the two groups.…”

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 85%

Comparison of Progression of Spontaneous Versus Induced Labor in Primi and Multiparous Women

Madan

Sharma

Yedla

et al. 2021

Asian J Pharm Clin Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives: The objectives of the study were to compare progression of spontaneous versus induced labor in primigravida and multigravida women. Methods: Pregnant women admitted in Labor room of Bebe Nanaki mother and Child Care Centre, Amritsar during April 2019–March 2020 were selected for this study. A total of 200 pregnant women were selected and divided into two groups. Women in group A were induced while in group B were women with spontaneous onset of labor. Labor progression in both was compared. Results: In group A, the mean duration of the active phase in primigravida was 4.08±2.30 h and in multigravida was 4.02±2.20 h. In group B, the mean duration of active phase in primigravidas was 7.24±1.39 h and in multigravidas was 6.48±1.40 h. In group A, the mean duration of the second stage in a primigravida was 25.5±8.15 min and in a multigravida was 17.38±9.95 min. In group B, the mean duration of the second stage in a primigravida was 41.3±9.6 min, while in a multigravida was 22.72±6.2 h. Discussion: The mean duration of active phase in group A in the primigravida and multigravida was almost similar, showing that induction does not have any effect on the duration of active phase. The mean duration of the second stage of group A in primigravida was 25 min and multipara was 17 min showing that induction reduces the duration of the second stage. Conclusion: Induction of labor when done at the right gestational age for correct indication is beneficial to women as it reduces the complications caused due to the continuation of high-risk pregnancies.

show abstract

“…p=0.08, shows no statistical significance. Similar study by Singh A et al (5) showed that mean gestational age among spontaneous labour was 39.37±1.46 and induced was 39.63±1.07 weeks. p=0.22, shows no statistical significance.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 77%

Comparison of Maternal and Foetal Outcome Between Induced Labour and Spontaneous Labour in Low Risk Pregnancy in Primigravida

Sadekar¹,

Patil²,

Patil³

2019

jemds

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BACKGROUND Induction of labour helps to reduce the number foetal deaths due to placental insufficiency caused by continuation of pregnancy beyond 40 weeks. Induction in unselected population has been associated with pronged labour, hyperstimulation, unsuccessful labour and iatrogenic prematurity. We wanted to compare maternal and foetal outcome between induced labour and spontaneous labour in primigravida low risk pregnancy. METHODS In this study, we included 146 women with term singleton pregnancy with vertex presentation in each group. Outcome measures were the mean duration of labour, mode of delivery and the foetomaternal outcomes. RESULTS There was no difference in the mean age, height and weight in the two groups. The average GA was 38.81 weeks in spontaneous group and 40.03 weeks in induced labour. More women had spontaneous vaginal delivery among those with spontaneous labour (84.24% versus 67.12%). Among those who were delivered vaginally, only 8% needed instrumental delivery in both groups; rest delivered normally. The mean duration of active stage of labour was significantly more in induced labour (5.32 hours) than in spontaneous labour (4.93 hours) (p=0.05). Average duration of induction to delivery in induced group was 13.29 hours. In the present study, among both groups, it was seen that foetal distress was the common reason for LSCS, followed by failure of induction among induced labour group, followed by maternal request, followed by non-decent of foetal head and non-progress of labour and one more reason that was noticed among spontaneous labour patient was persistent occipitoposterior position. CONCLUSIONS No statistically significant difference was seen with regard to mean APGAR scores and maternal complications in the two groups, but rate of caesarean section increased in induced labour.

show abstract

Comparison of progress of labour and maternofetal outcome among induced versus spontaneous labour in nulliparous women using modified WHO partograph

Cited by 5 publications

References 6 publications

A comparative study of spontaneous versus induced labor in primi and multiparous women at tertiary care centre

A comparative study of spontaneous versus induced labor in primi and multiparous women at tertiary care centre

Comparison of Progression of Spontaneous Versus Induced Labor in Primi and Multiparous Women

Comparison of Maternal and Foetal Outcome Between Induced Labour and Spontaneous Labour in Low Risk Pregnancy in Primigravida

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About