2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2019.11.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Pulp Sensibility Tests Responses in Type 2 Diabetes Patients and Healthy Individuals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The sample size in the present survey was larger than in some literature [ 10 , 22 , 23 ] and similar to the study by Tavakolinejad Kermani et al [ 24 ]. Since various factors, including the health status of the patients, could affect the response to sensibility tests, strict inclusion criteria were applied in the present study [ 22 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The sample size in the present survey was larger than in some literature [ 10 , 22 , 23 ] and similar to the study by Tavakolinejad Kermani et al [ 24 ]. Since various factors, including the health status of the patients, could affect the response to sensibility tests, strict inclusion criteria were applied in the present study [ 22 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Aging has a negative impact on the results of the EPT [ 24 , 29 ]. Therefore, the mean age of participants in both groups who participated in the present survey was similar, with no significant difference.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aging has a negative impact on the results of EPT [ 21 ]. Therefore, the mean age of participants in both groups was similar with no significant differences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sample size of the present study was 120, more than some studies on the evaluation of sensibility tests in systemic diseases [ 30 , 31 ] and similar to Tavakolinejad [ 32 ]. Our strict inclusion criteria were one of the priorities of this study toward others.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%