2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2016.08.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of quadrant-specific breast cancer incidence trends in the United States and England between 1975 and 2013

Abstract: Background: UK breast cancer incidence rates suggest that upper outer quadrant (UOQ) cancers have risen disproportionately compared with other areas over time. We aimed to provide a comparison of the trend in quadrant-specific breast cancer incidence between the United States (US) and England, and determine whether a disproportionate UOQ increase is present.Methods: Surveillance Epidemiology and End Result (SEER) cancer registry data were obtained on 630,007 female breast cancers from 1975-2013. English cancer… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, among studies that consider location of IBTR, it is unclear how far a tumor must be from the tumor bed to be considered a NP 14,15,19 . The likelihood of a NP developing near the tumor bed is also significant, especially in considering that most breast cancers arise in the upper outer quadrant 36 . Furthermore, when not combined with other classification criteria such as change in histologic type, location alone may not portend a statistically significant difference in prognosis 14,37 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, among studies that consider location of IBTR, it is unclear how far a tumor must be from the tumor bed to be considered a NP 14,15,19 . The likelihood of a NP developing near the tumor bed is also significant, especially in considering that most breast cancers arise in the upper outer quadrant 36 . Furthermore, when not combined with other classification criteria such as change in histologic type, location alone may not portend a statistically significant difference in prognosis 14,37 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These factors explain only a small part of the etiology (Turnbull and Rahman, 2008) suggesting that environmental factors may also be relevant in the development of breast cancer (Bonefeld-Jorgensen et al, 2011, Coyle, 2004). A change in the topological distribution of mammary carcinoma since 1975 (Bright et al, 2016, Darbre, 2016, Darbre, 2009, Darbre, 2005, Darbre, 2005) towards an higher incidence in the upper outer quadrant seems to point to underarm cosmetic products (UCPs) as a potential contributor (Darbre, 2009, Darbre, 2005, Darbre, 2005, Darbre et al, 2013b). Previous studies investigating the effect of UCPs on breast cancer have shown conflicting results (McGrath, 2003, Mirick et al, 2002, Pasha et al, 2008, Rodrigues-Peres et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is reported that proportions of tumors located in the upper outer quadrant, upper inner quadrant, lower inner quadrant, and lower outer quadrant are 41.2-46.9%, 11.-13.1%, 5.6-5.8%, and 8.2-8.5%, respectively. 29 The incidence of BC is proportional to the amount of breast tissue. 30 In our study, the incidence of tumor in the upper outer quadrant is also the highest (32.1%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%